Judge Adams – Homicidal, Hullucinating, Psychotic Babysitter Is OK.


Here is a link to a section of a transcript where Judge Adams, after reviewing a homicidal, hullucinating, psychotic babysitter’s medical records in chambers with both attorney’s was keeping the medical records out.   The father had repeatedly stated he was going to continue to have this babysitter watch his son up to 12 hours a day at least 6 days a week, no matter what the medical records showed.       (click on blue link to see the transcript) ->.    Judge Adams helps put a child in danger.

I have read and been present when the medical records of the homicidal babysitter were reviewed by the child’s psychologist.   The psychologist was very distressed that the judge had intentionally kept out records of a known life-threatening danger to a child.   In the transcript where it states “The Court:    I hope the child doesn’t get hurt.    No further questions.”   Was actually Mr. Sibley’s statement.   And at this point a certain small exchange was excluded by the court reporter.

Just before the quote above in this paragraph.   Mr. Sibley asked, “Your honor, you mean that the babysitter for this child being homicidal is not relevent?”.   In response, Judge Adams simply said, “Yep”.    I was there.    The court room was full.    Many others were there.   All were shocked.

State law and Judicial Canons required Judge Adams to protect the child from any hazard coming to his knowledge.  Judge Adams violated law, in this laymen’s opinion, when he refused to protect the child.   It, also, seems this typical Texas Family Law Judge became a party to criminal endangerment of this little 7 year old child.   Again, just my opinion, after 20 years of intense involvement in parents’ rights advocacy in Texas.

Court Reporters are the judge’s political appointees in Texas and most States in the U.s. Court reporters do not type the full and accurate transcription of what happens when court is in session.   I discovered that truth personally

Through a licensing board, I managed to get a court reporter sanctioned, Yvette Shurgart, of Victoria Texas by the Texas Court Reporter’s Certification Board.   I managed to get her sanctioned for embezzling money from me and destroying a transcript of my ex-wife testifying that her mother had prostituted my ex’s older sister on the streets of Corpus Christi when that sibling was as young as 9 to 11 years of age.   It was during the process of following through on my grievances, when I discovered in Texas, Court Reporters make very large incomes each year selling transcripts for rates of $1.50 to $7.50 U.S per page made with county supplies, while on county salaries, to litigants for appeal or documentation purposes, as personal income.

The transcript portion which is provided in the link above, left out considerable, but included enough to show Mr. Sibley and his client making every effort to protect a 7 year old child.

In the year since the transcripted hearing, the father was given custody of the child, the child has spent the majority of his awake hours, when not at school with  the homicidal, hallucinating, sometimes psychotic babysitter.   A neighbor of the homicidal babysitter video taped, as discussed in another blog entry, the boy on a busy, narrow commercial road riding his bicycle, unsupervised.

The part-time psychotic babysitter has stated she drives under the influence of extremely strong medications ranging from anti-psychotics and anti-depressants to anti-anxiety pills, since she is supposed to be taking her medications several times a day.   All of these various psychotropic drugs preclude her from driving legally.    I read the medical history and current list of medications while a psychologist explained what each  diagnosis and medication was and how they limited the capacity of anyone to care for young children or to drive.   Judge Adams was told of this in chambers with attorney’s for both parents present.   That conference was only minutes prior to the transcript provided above.   Judge Adams stated he did not want to see the records and he saw no relevence in presenting them in the custody case before him.    The little boy’s mother and her attorney tried to protect the child without the need for publicity on the extreme mental illness and open danger to the child left alone with his homicidal, hallucinatory, and drugged up Aunt.   The little boy’s Aunt had a medical record that read very similarly to what is known of Judge Adams mother, according to Hallie Adams, Judge Adams own wife.

In the case of the homicidal, part-time psychotic babysitter Judge Adams has forced the little boy’s mother and her attorney to put the Aunt’s medical history into the open public record in an effort to protect the child.   As of November 28, 2011, the little boy has been in the care of the homicidal, drugged. time-bomb of a baby sitter for 13 months.

Judge Adams went a step beyond the absurd in this case.   Judge Adams sanctioned the attorney and the mother for trying to protect a child the judge knew the judge was putting into danger.   The judge was giving this child up to a be with a homicidal, suicidal, part-time psychotic, and hallucinating babysitter who had been repeatedly hospitalized in the recent past for the safety of the general public.

This homicidal babysitter, drugged to the gills by the State of Texas for the safety of the public, drives the boy to and from school.  The boy’s school is a major portion of the distance across Corpus Christi.  Good Ole’ drugged up, homicidal, suicidal, hallucinating, sometimes psychotic babysitter ( a member of the father’s family) is driving the streets of Corpus twice a day during the school year with an innocent 7 year old in the car with her.

Judge Adams not only approved, but actively worked at doing this as a favor to the attorney , Lynette Joubert, a long time cohort and co-conspirator of William Dudley, good friend and attorney for Judge William Adams.

William Dudley is the attorney who wrote and sent out the press release for Judge Adams blaming the daughter for the beating she was given.   In a previous case, William Dudley has been documented loudly mocking Christianity in open court, turning chairs upside down on table while an opposition attorney was attempting to present evidence to a judge, and admitted to abusing a child to multiples of individuals including a senior pediatric forensic psychologist.  After the psychologist in that case repeatedly asked William Dudley if he understood what he was saying when he said “I helped abuse this child.” , the psychologist, Dr. Barbara Beckham, filed a grievance with the Texas Bar Association for ethics violations.   When the grievance was heard by the local Corpus Christi, Texas Bar grievance committee, Mr. Dudley walked into the administrative hearing and in the first 10 seconds announced that Dr. Beckham had recanted her complaint.   Dr. Beckham’s attorney was present in the hearing and immediately asked to call Dr. Beckham from the adjacent waiting room.   Dr. Beckham, within 60 seconds of the hearing being called stated clearly that she had definitely not recanted.    William Dudley, Judge Adams current attorney, probably set a new record for proving an ethics  violation against himself  within 60 seconds of the hearing being called.

The Texas Bar Representative present at that local Bar hearing was Mr. James Ehler.   The local Bar issued a ruling several days later that they found William Dudley had committed no violation of the Texas Bar Ethics rules for attorneys.    Dr. Beckham’s attorney, David Sibley, Esq.,  filed a grievance against the local Bar grievance committee, including Mr. James Ehler.   Mr. Ehler, in his governmental capacity has had a very apparent open vendetta against Mr. Sibley from the time of the filing against the grievance committee for ignoring the violation of ethics committed by Mr. William Dudley, during a hearing against Mr. Dudley.  The grievance committee also ignored the open boasting, admissions that William Dudley had been knowingly helping to abuse a child.   Mr. Dudley had made those admissions in front of four witnesses.  All of whom were present and willing to testify to the Bar grievance committee.   Only Dr. Beckham was called and she was ignored.

In the case of the homicidal babysitter, the father who got custody and turned his child over to the homicidal and hullucinating babysitter,  testified the mother was a good mother and other than documented effort by the father to make false sex abuse allegations against the mother, there were no criticisms of the mom.  (This is another well documented story about a second judge and William Dudley abusing another child)   But, Judge Adams, who could have ordered, at the very least, the child not be left with the this homicidal babysitter, did not even do that.   The judge must have believed that since he survived being raised by his mother, this little five year old boy could survive being raised by his hallucinating and part time psychotic Aunt.

Judge Adams, as a favor to his attorney friends, Lynette Joubert, William Dudley, and William Kelly, gave a 7 year old over to a part-time psyschotic, full-time homicidal and drugged up babysitter.  All three had been party to the efforts to have the second judge intimidate a 5 year old boy into saying his mother touched him ‘bad’ and that he had been made to watch his mother and her attorney in bed.   The mother and attorney had no romantic relationship.  This was an attempt to create a false outcry by a child accusing the innocent mother and attorney of child sex abuse.

The second portion of the transcript exerpt gives a bit more information on these attorneys and another Judge in nearby Nueces County attempting to persuade and intimidate the 7 year old boy to falsely claim his mother touched him sexually and that the boy had been  made to watch the mother and her attorney have sex in bed together.  There is much more to this sordid story.   It is generally typical of what is done to fathers in Texas family courts, not mothers

This is how the State of Texas handles the “Best Interest of the Child” standard which the legislature has refused to define in any manner except to leave it open for the judges in Texas to enrich themselves and their good friends.

This author is talking to the mother and her attorney in an effort to be able to post the video of the little boy on the busy highway in front of the homicidal babysitter’s house, unsupervised.  The father’s babysitter for the child is nowhere in sight and often passed out on the couch while the boy wanders the street and neighborhood.  Remember, not even the father who now has custody has ever stated the mother did anything wrong in the care of the child.

These medical records of the babysitter were duly subpoenaed and delivered over and received in full compliance of both Federal and State Health Information Privacy statutes and rules.  These records have been filed with the Aransas County District Clerk.  They are a matter of public record and  in files available to the general public.

Unsealed divorce records are public accessible, except where the Aransas County District Clerk lies to the person requesting access to public files.  This has been done to help Judge Adams take money form Mr. Sibley in sanctions that would not have succeeded had Mr. Sibley had full knowledge of the public record.  Judge Adams has hidden from David Sibley and the mother in this case, the judge’s close personal and business ties to Lynette Joubert and William Dudley.  These are serious conflicts of interest.

This is an interesting and sinister story for another time of how the Aransas County District Clerk helped to hide the public record files of Judge Adams divorce from para-legals and from attorney David Sibley, the attorney for the mother of the child in the transcripted case referenced above.

It seems Mr. Sibley was unaware of the ongoing attorney-client relationship between Adams and Dudley when Adams sanctioned Sibley for attempting to subpoena a copy of a family law text written by Dudley and William Kelly.  The Aransas County District Clerk seems to have conspired with Judge Adams and William Dudley to enrich themselves with fines assessed against Mr. Sibley while denying him the public record to defend himself.   Neither Judge Adams nor Dudley revealed their personal and business relationships to Mr. Sibley or to the child’s mother.

Is this how Judge Adams pays his attorney, with the fines assessed to others?

Judge William Adams & Friends-Symptoms of Greater Ills


Rockport Texas Judge Adams, who is featured in a new viral child abuse video as a man who beats his disabled daughter in an extremely cruel and violent manner with strong sexual overtones, was first exposed for bizarre courtroom antics and turning a child over to a homicidal and suicidal woman over a sane stable mother in this blog.   I and others began our battle to hold this abusive judge accountable almost 13 months ago.

The new video is extremely hard to watch.  However, knowing the judge, the only surprise was that his daughter taped his violence and then distributed it.   Good for her!

But, the video has more impact than just the judge beating his daughter.  It now brings out how three of his good friend family law attorneys whom I watched him dramatically favor in a courtroom above and beyond reasonable judicial behavior had used this judge’s sanction against an attorney for a lawful and legitimate subpoena to make efforts to disbar the attorney representing the sane stable mother.

These are the same three attorneys involved in the abuse of the little 7 year old boy handed over to the homicidal, hallucinating, psychotic.  These attorneys have tried to use another Texas judge to tamper with the boy as a witness and convince the boy to lie that his mother had sexually touched him and that the boy had watched his mother and her attorney in bed having sex.

The three good friends of this sick and perverted Texas judge, no not the unnamed one trying to intimidate the 7 year old, but of the sick perverted Judge Adams, were the same ones to repeatedly use false allegations (admitted and proven false) against my child and me to keep me from protecting my child from a mother who testified the sexual abuse of our child at the age of two by a serial molester convicted of molesting three other little girls, was “humorous” and “appropriate”.   My ex continued to place my child around her convicted molester, sometimes completely alone with him.   These three attorney’s, good friends of William Adams, used a plethora of dirty tricks, including false sex abuse allegations to keep my child with their client, while their judge friends had me paying my ex’s attorney fees “in the Best Interest of the Child” for their false allegations against me.   I have watched them use these and other dirty tricks against others whom we have volunteered our time to assist as they, also, fought these three and their judge buddies.

One, of the three, I had sanctioned but not disbarred by the Texas Bar after she first represented me then represented my ex-wife (three times) and then a visitation center.  Eventually, in Federal Court, Lynette Joubert’s visitation center was shut down in my pro se Federal suit including these three attorneys and my ex-wife.  She was sanctioned after I complained on three separate instances of her coming back into the case against me, AND after helping at least three others make the almost exact same complaints in their own cases.   When I received notice that she was sanctioned in my case, the documents included a sanction for doing the same to a person I had not previously known.

Another of these three attorneys had admitted to abusing my child in front of me, my attorney, a paralegal and a senior forensic pediatric psychologist.    In a discussion of the false allegations attorney William Dudley not only admitted to abusing my child he stated that what he had done to me and my child was the very reason he had vasectomy and raised the step-children of his various wives.

When the local bar grievance committee held the hearing against that attorney, William Dudley, in the first ten seconds, before the hearing was called to order, Dudley proclaimed the witness, Dr. Barbara Beckham, had recanted.   Dr. Beckham was outside the door of the hearing room.  She was called into the hearing, asked if she recanted, and Dr. Beckham stated in no uncertain terms that she had not recanted.  In less than the first 60 seconds of that grievance hearing against Dudley he lied to the committee, then was proven to have lied to the committee with the testimony of the complainant, Dr. Beckham.

William Dudley lied to the grievance committee.  The Texas Bar Rules clearly state that a lawyer “Shall” not lie to any tribunal.   Dudley lied to the tribunal of the grievance committee.   The grievance committee ruled Dudley had done nothing to violate any Bar Rules, including lying to that very committee.  David Sibley filed a grievance against the committee for an obvious fraud in their behavior and ruling.   Nothing was ever heard of that grievance.   It was kept secret, even from Mr. Sibley, the complainant.

The third attorney in this Triad, William Kelly, had knowingly filed false and unfounded allegations against me as a tactic to keep his client from losing custody.  His client is the one who testified the molestation of my child at her second birthday party was ‘humorous’ and ‘appropriate’.   William Kelly’s sister in law was named Attorney ad Litem for my child.   We were not told of this close family relationship.   The attorney ad litem,  Jeannette Cantu-Bazar was caught lying under oath that she had interviewed witnesses who stated I was molesting my child in the playground area of a city park during daylight hours.   The ad litem had to admit she had never talked to the witnesses and when we finally got the names of the witnesses and got them on the stand, they stated the only person they had talked to was my ex-wife and had never talked to Cantu-Bazar.  Cantu-Bazar had submitted a false billing for these falsely claimed interviews.   With transcripts, documents, and witness statements, the local Bar stated there was no evidence against Janette Cantu-Bazar that she had done anything wrong.

An attorney, Sam Westergren, who witnessed William Kelly laughing and joking about keeping my child from me with false allegations, gave me an affidavit of that event.

When William Kelly ran for Corpus Christi city council, I used the affidavit in a campaign brochure against Kelly.  Kelly had Judge Henry Schuble call me into court and gag me.   Political scientist and associate professor at Howard University, Stephen Baskerville, documented this gross denial of civil rights and violation of Federal Law in his bestselling book ‘Taken Into Custody’.    I had distributed 1,000 of the brochures; I had to destroy three thousand just days before the election.   Kelly won by 800 votes.   This was the closest margin in over 15 years for anyone winning that seat on the Corpus City Council.

We eventually got the judge that helped William Kelly  in his campaign reportedly pulled off my case and off theTexas bench alltogether for two full years.  This was the now deceased Judge Henry Schuble.

And, there is so much more that we have carefully documented and maintained archived records on that we can spend years just writing of the abuses committed by several judges and these three attorneys in that on little area of Texas.

This is what Texas Justice is all about.

And, the question begging to be asked… “Where have the FBI and Texas Rangers been all this time?”

After asking for investigations into these two cases and others, I can answer with an age old South Texas saying… “Quien Sabe?”  (Who Knows?)

 

The Child Abusing Judge Adams I Know


Judge William Adams of Rockport, Texas ruled that a homicidal, hallucinatory, psychotic, heavily medicated, suicidal person with whom the child is left with for prolonged periods by the father is not relevant to safety or Best Interest of the Child. I sat in the courtroom and watched this travesty transpire. All present, including the judge’s own staff seemed shocked and taken aback by this bizarre ruling. Is this the real meaning of Best Interest of the Child? Is this how jaded and immune our courts and media have become where real danger is minimized and false allegations lionized?

The visible arrogance of Judge Adams was comparable to the arrogance of the Medieval Italian Prince to whom Machiavelli was writing in the book by the same name, “The Prince”. The judge was exercising raw, unbridled power for which he has nearly absolute immunity. This is the life of a false sex allegation. Just ask Jennifer Mata in Rockport, Texas what it is like to be the target of a conspiracy to falsely accuse

I was in the courtroom that day.   I testified at that hearing.   I watched Judge Adams turn a child over to a woman diagnosed and regularly hospitalized by the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation as a threat to the general public.   Judge Adams stated that one of the parents promise to leave this child with if they gained  custody, that parent was represented by a cohort of the judge’s personal attorney, William Dudley of Corpus Christi, Texas.    

William Dudley is helping the judge go for custody of another and much younger daughter than the one he beat in the recent viral video.

I was present in the courtroom when Judge Adams stated  that the child’s daycare provider of one of the parents, who claimed they would continue with this daycare,  being diagnosed as sometimes psychotic, hallucinatory, homicidal, suicidal, and drugged beyond the point of being able to drive was irrelevent to the custody issue.

That hearing was a year ago.   Since then the boy, now 7, has continued to be left the majority of the time with this dangerous daycare provider.   CPS has done nothing.

Neighbors of the psychotic woman video taped the young boy on his bicycle in the road in front of the psychotic’s home.  The road is the road to the Corpus Christi dump.  Heavy trucks race up and down the road continually.  The road is narrow with deep ditches on each side.   Texas CPS has refused to act on this neglect and criminal endangerment of this child.

This is a case where I testified to the pattern of false allegations by a set of independent attorneys who claim to be unofficial partners in abuse of parents in family court, a 6 year old child, boy referenced above, made an outcry to his mother that his father, his father’s adult, police sergeant uncle, his father’s attorney, a judge in this case, and the attorney for the father’s attorney met at the child’s favorite local restaurant and was told by the judge and others to lie and say his mother had touched him sexually and that he had watched his mother and her attorney have sex in bed.  The boy refused and then told his mother when he saw her next.

I have a copy of the boy’s recorded testimony to this restaurant meeting.   It is an audiovideo recording I will post when we have redacted the visible portions of the boys face and his name.

The mother’s attorney, Mr. David Sibley, interviewed the owner of the restaurant and received a copy of the ticket for the specific large group table the child stated the party had sat. The correct number of adults and one child was shown on the ticket. The two waiters who attended the table both knew the father and son but not the others. The two waiters confirmed, one with courtroom testimony and the other in a sworn affidavit, the father, son, and others dressed in business attire were at the table at the time the child indicated.

The child further stated the police officer relative drove the judge to child’s aunt’s house, where the other adults went as well. The child said the efforts to get the child to make false allegations by the adults continued at the Aunt’s house.

The young child stated the police officer later drove the judge, whom the child had met in a court appearance, back to the judge’s home in the officer’s patrol car.

Mr. Sibley subpoenaed the GPS records for the official patrol car the child stated the police officer was driving. The GPS records for that car were provided with a fifteen hour gap in the records for that car. The gap corresponds with the time the child stated the meeting was held. The GPS readings stopped at a location far removed from where they resumed almost exactly 15 hours later.

The child was taken to a well experienced pediatric psychologist who discussed the child’s statements with the child and found no cause to disbelieve the child.

The judge and others have refused to deny, on the record that there was a meeting at that restaurant on that date and time.

Police are not investigating this effort to influence a witness to make false allegations. The police are not investigating the use of a police sergeant and his vehicle in the crime of attempting to influence and intimidate a witness to falsely accuse his own mother of sex crimes. The media won’t touch it. And the three Bitchhood spin miesters claim no one is harmed by false allegations. This has been common fare for the past 20 + years in falsely accusing men.

Now for the Piece de resistance, the father states the mother is a good mother but the father wants the aunt, who participated in part of the effort to intimidate the child into making a false outcry against his mother, to be his son’s new mother now that the father and mother are divorced.

The aunt has a history of treatment by Texas State Mental Health and Mental Retardation psychiatrists for being homicidal, hallucinatory, occasionally psychotic, suicidal, suffering from Major Depressive disorder and extremely heavily medicated to control the mental issues. Or at least she is heavily medicated when she takes her prescriptions. The aunt is in denial that she has mental issues and was falsely denying, under oath, that she had been repeatedly hospitalized for her mental illnesses by the State to protect her and others.

How can it be explained away when  The Honorable William Adams of Aransas County, Texas, ruled that the medical condition and records of the father’s preferred care provider, the homocidal, hallucinating and sometimes psychotic caregiverfor his son and the father’s preferred new mother for the child, should he gain custody is not relevant. The judge had only moments before heard the father state that irrespective of medical records, he would ignore the diagnosis and continue to leave his son with this homicidal psychotic.

Male Suicide: Murderous Women’s Weapon of Choice (Gendercide of Males Explained)


Arlington Natl Cemetary Graves

We have lost more men and boys in the last 30 years from feminist policy than in all wars in the last 70 years. This is a major part of feminism’s war on your sons and children. In body count alone we are talking a half million men and if we include the boys murdered and aborted we are discussing inconceivable numbers approaching 30 million murdered males.

We dismiss the rantings of the feminists who publish works calling for the extinction or near extinction of all males. We have entered an era where gendercide has become not just figurative with the demeaning media programming, but literal in the silence as a mass slaughter of males has begun to quietly take place in the War Against Men, disguised as a false claim of a War Against Women. It was a very well done propaganda campaign to claim there is a War Against Women to hide the savagery and barbarism of feminism as it gains influence in our legislatures and courts.

65 men a day commit suicide, roughly 2/3’s, or 42, of those kill themselves over loss of children, home, family, and freedom in divorce. One third, or 22, of these men who kill themselves each day are Veterans. Half of the 56 million children murdered in the U.S. through the feminist’s pet program, abortion, were boys.

Suicide is the number two and three leading cause of death for young men aged 14 to 34 as reported by the CDC.

Yet our media is silent.

We are losing more men per year than we did in Viet Nam. We have lost, roughly, 500,000 men to divorce caused suicide in 30 years. But that is not the least of feminism’s slaughter of innocents. As an aside note, one of the top two or three most important issues supported and maintained by feminists is the use of abortion as birth control in a time when we have over 30 different methods and products for birth control. That has cost America 56 MILLION baby boys and girls in the last 30+ years since Roe v. Wade. Feminism spreads death as has Communism. And that is just the toll in America.

I am not advocating homosexuality for your sons, that is another type of tragic death sentence where the issues are kept out of the public eye as this sad life style choice’s hazards and pitfalls for the homosexuals as well as for the community where they live.

The emotional destruction and the driving to suicide of mass numbers of men has taken on a world wide view. We are seeing this same phenomenon world wide where feminism has worked to deny men and children any domestic or personal rights at all when it is convenient for a woman. Death and destruction is wide spread from feminism.

Feminism is an ideology that exploits our natural tendency of men and women to protect women from abuse and even from threatened or perceived abuse. That is a genetic drive in undamaged men, the protection of women and children. It is so ingrained that altruistic and esoteric concerns of perceived threats will send mass numbers of men off to war and death to protect their women and children from just the distant thought of a threat to those most precious to them, their women and children. This is not the mindset of slave masters or a species with a male dominant trait to prey upon females. Yet, it is the mindset of feral women toward men and our society and media even teaches women to see men as prey while falsely claiming victimhood.

Feminism poses a false world view that all the systems set up to protect and make life easier for women are only an effort at enslavement and abuse by men who only see women as cattle. Yes, there will always be one of the statistically almost non-existent males who can be pointed to as an example of that attitude, but it is not an example of all men as feminism would make it out.

If men had that attitude, then many long years ago we would have gone extinct as men would have let the lions and other predators eat the slower running pregnant women.

If men were enslaving of women, why is it that nearly every woman in marriage will have the nicer car, will have clothes in volumes of hundreds of times more dollar value than the man’s and will have luxuries and pampering provided the man never partakes.

Yet, in a heartbeat the woman will abandon and even work to destroy, murder, imprison, or intentionally drive to suicide, the man who has risked life and health to give the woman luxuries, fineries, time saving devices, the better car, the most time away from work, and allow her the most time at home.

What do the men get, cultural ridicule and virtual death sentences for their families, careers, and even lives.

Not even the men’s children can reliably be counted on as his children without DNA testing. The American Blood Bank has done DNA studies that determined 24% of those who donate are not children of the man who was the married partner of their mother at time of birth.

Similar findings were made as many states in an effort to detect possible genetic related issues mandated DNA testing at birth by statute. These findings were quickly made confidential as it became evident that 20% to upwards of 45%, in one New England state, of the children born in wedlock were not the husband’s child. That could indicate an even greater number of women were cheating with the ready availability and widespread use of female birth control.

Then we go to the courts where it is not uncommon for an HIV infected crack whore is allowed or given custody over a clean, sober father with a steady job. One only has to look at the opening of the instructional manual for Texas Judges to see what type of official anti-male prejudice is stated as expected of the courts against men and in favor of women.

30,000 men are committing suicide a year because of the abuse from women that is validated and made worse by courts, police. Even our mental health professionals and churches are providing validation of the abuse and abusers.

This is the greatest fraud and scam the world has seen since Communism. We are talking about feminism and its insinuation into our culture. As men are destroyed, so are the children and even adult women.

The loss of children, home, assets, future income, and even basic civil rights in No Fault divorce where he was declared innocent by a court is a life-time devastation to the man. Men appear to be more grounded in the long term needs of their children and more tightly tied to the well being of their children. Women commit vastly greater amounts of abuse and neglect of children even without counting the alienation of children from the father. Mental health professionals have stated that getting a child to alienate a good parent from their life is more destructive than long term child sexual abuse.

Do not forget that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services tracks the murders of children and mothers commit two thirds of the murder of children. And 2 out of 3 of these children murdered by women are boys.

Men are not allowed to recover in divorce and move on. They must struggle to pay 1/3 of their income to their ex’s while also paying full taxes on all their income. Then men are expected to pay all the health insurance and half of the deductibles and out of pocket. And this is before the man spends money to travel to see his kids, even if in the same town. He must maintain his own home and then provide all the entertainment and supplies for caring for his own children if or when he gets to see them.

If protective orders are in place, the man can go to prison for attempting to reconcile with an ex. A man can go to prison for sending his children Christmas cards. A man can go to prison for responding to a text from his wife about his children’s needs. The children will be used against him in a thousand and one ways.  And the courts will laugh and encourage ever greater abuse and enslavement of a man the same court ruled was innocent of any wrong doing in a No Fault divorce.

Strangers with no love for his children will be allowed to raise the man’s children, live in the man’s house, sleep with the man’s wife, spend the man’s money and all the while the court is calling this good man and father a ‘deadbeat’ and worse.

How To Start Cleaning-Up Texas Family Court Judges


If you were a corrupt judge, would you want your misdeeds aired on YouTube minutes after you behaved badly or even criminally while on the bench? That is why judges Texas are fighting against being forced to have audio video recording in their courtroom that is available to anyone who asks.

Texas has no audio-video transcription of court proceedings. Yet, Texas has one of the highest felony conviction rates of judges in the U.S. And there is a real problem, throughout the U.S. It has become so common that there is a name for it, The Black Robe Disease.

And little is being done by the mechanisms set up to keep judges ethical and lawful. A prime example is how Judge William Adams was allowed to return to the bench after his disabled daughter posted a video online.

Three years later at his next election the voters booted William Adams out, but in the three years remaining on his term, he worked hard at retaliating against the man who defeated him in the election and he used the Texas Bar to retaliate against other attorneys who had been working to rid our citizens of the parasite judge.

Court Transcripts are often as false as a hookers claim of virginity. And the lies will always be in favor of making the judge look good.

Most judges appoint their own bailiffs and court reporters. Their choices are often more personal and political than for efficiency of court business, unless you consider the rogue judges consider court proceedings to be their personal self-aggrandizing and enrichment. Rarely do the court personnel report bad judges, the work is too lucrative in these hard times.

This brings us to the real problem of falsified records of court proceedings.

Court reporters lucrative jobs are basically political appointments by the judge for whom they work. Court Transcripts are routinely and regularly edited by the court reporters and often at the judge’s direct instruction to change the transcript to fit the judge’s personal and political needs and wants. The court reporter is a bigger player in the courtroom than anyone outside of the judge in whether or not there is any semblance of due process and a fair chance at appeal. And that has been subverted for decades in Texas.

Court reporters are paid county salaries of between $60,000 and $85,000 a year and are provided their equipment, supplies, and offices at county expense, however the transcripts they make on county time, in the courthouse, with county supplies is considered by the court to be the court reporters personal property and the transcripts the court reporter sells to the litigants and others, again, using county supplies to print work done completely at county expense for personal profit. This can double or triple the income for a court reporter over their county salary. What are the pressures the judge can apply to a reticent court reporter who is making $120 thousand to $300 thousand a year with no overhead and most of it on a cash basis.

Tell me how much you would trust the court reporter to provide a transcript of a judge threatening to murder a litigant, from the bench. Or, telling a desperate parent the someone else’s molestation of the parent’s two year old child was ‘OK and just people being people’. I don’t know who they hang out with to have them believe that child molestation is somehow ‘OK’ by OK people.

Texas judges were being convicted of felonies, through 2013, at rates of two to ten times the rate of the rest of the citizens of Texas. We have been seeing felony convictions at rates of several per hundred judges whereas in a given year in the general public we see about 4 to 6 per thousand. Those judges who were successfully prosecuted were the most blatant of offenders who were caught.

Invariably, most of those convicted judges’ worst and most criminal acts were on the bench. Most stayed on their bench for prolonged periods after the allegations came to light, continuing to lash out at the community and individuals that was attempting to get rid of them. The many escapades of the Texas Judges, William Adams, Henry Schuble, Bobby Galvan and others in a small central Texas Gulf Coast area speak volumes about the lackadaisical attitude of monitoring agencies and other judges ignoring and allowing out of control judiciary to terrorize and destroy many in the community for the fun, profit, and perversions of the corrupt ones.

If a crooked judge is allowed to stay in office by other judges, which judges are worse, the ones acting criminally towards the public, or those allowing it? Shouldn’t we remove those judges made culpable by their own silence in a community?

When there is video of court hearings available to all immediately after the court is adjourned, the removal of judges can be swift. When there is no video it is difficult to quickly remove, or even prove these judges are the criminals their actions belie.

With mandatory 24-7 audio-video (AV) recording of courts we can help protect our courts and our rights from abuses.

These are the people who are making rulings about the lives of our children, our homes, and our futures.

In 2004, the front page of the Corpus Christi Caller-Times had an article about a 2003 Texas survey by the judiciary on the public’s opinion of the judiciary. As it turned out 85% of Texans believed that judges made their rulings based on money, sex, friendship, family, or politics over facts and law. Is your opinion of our courts any different.

There are any number of national surveys and organizations that have pointed out the abuses of the criminals, sociopaths, and tyrants on our courts’ benches. Isn’t it time we began to hold them accountable for their crimes against men, women, children, and even humanity, itself?

Power corrupts, Power without accountability corrupts completely. Our courts have slowly developed for themselves and others within government the old concept of Sovereign Immunity. It is the concept that the King is immune from the laws since he makes the laws. Let that sink in for a minute and then watch these two videos. Keep in mind, I have, personally, seen worse, in open court, including a judge threatening to send a man to jail so the judge could have a lifer murder him in exchange for the lifer getting a prison cell near his family. I have watched judges laugh at children being molested. I have watched judges openly state they are knowingly violating an individual’s Constitutional Rights, and more. Those who have ever spent much time in court will agree, our judges have become ‘Blacked Robed Tyrants’ as I heard the president of an attorney’s association testify before The Texas Sunset Commission when it was reviewing the Judicial Conduct Commission and its failures to rein in the bad judges in Texas.

Without Video, who would have moved forward on this to quickly rid our courts of these men and women infected with the ‘Black Robe Disease’?

Even with video, the power mad sociopaths who inhabit our courts all too frequently, will still hurt and harm. But at least we will have a way to rapidly address and remove judges without it taking years and finally an election.

Not even sexual predation is outside the scope of abuse in court, and family courts are the worst.

The problem is more complex than can be cured by the simple installation and maintenance of cameras in our courts, we must also address the issues of out of control Sovereign immunity. However, AV recording of all hearings or those hearings without AV of both the courtroom and judge available, unedited are void, would quickly begin the process of cleaning up the tyranny of bad and even evil judges. Best of all, it allows the public to see, as with Judge William Adams beating of his disabled child, and take the needed action at the polls if the judicial monitoring agencies fail to protect the public, again, Judge Adams is a great example of that ‘turning a blind eye’ towards the evil of one of their own over the public’s right to fair and SANE judges.

Does Judicial Training Teach Jim Crow Laws Against Men?


Image

VAWA IS A JIM CROW LAW AGAINST ALL MEN AND THEIR CHILDREN.

Do you ever wonder why good men are turned into deadbeats isolated from their families in the face of common sense and the needs of the children?Prejudicial instructions and training material for judges, against men, reminiscent of the Jim Crow days are commonly published IN SECRET. I have been excluded from lawfully attending and observing the training of judges and the policy instructions on handling family law as bought and paid for by VAWA grants.  One only has to look at the public budget records to see these Federal Funds being applied for and accepted.  Yet I, as a tax paying American Citizen am denied attendance, video observation, or even presentation outline of any of this secret and private training of our judiciary to destroy children and men.
Massive Judicial Ex Part: I have been trying to attend a Judicial Training Conference as an observer. I have recently discovered the prejudice imposed on men through the Judicial Bench Book instructions defining men as perpetrators of DV and women as victims. It turns out the group holding the meeting is a group with a non-profit charter, yet they are funded in the main part by state funds.
This group’s bylaws do not allow anyone other than a Texas Judge to attend. They are excluded from the Texas Open Meetings Act because the judiciary is not included in the definition of governmental agency.“The section 551.001(3)(A) definition of “governmental body” includes only entities within the executive and legislative departments of the state. It therefore excludes the judiciary from the Act.67″These training programs are what make the family law rulings homogenous across the state and the country and the public is excluded from what the real rules and laws are on families in this country. The legislated statutes and intent are apparently being bypassed by other groups, including the injustice bought and paid for by VAWA.   There is no transparency in the training and instructing of judges in Texas or in the numerous states where I have researched.  There may be some.  I have not checked all, but I doubt if there are any state judiciary training programs open to any public monitoring.
The implications for increasing judicial abuse and control is terrifying.
Children are murdered, abused, and molested; and men driven to suicide by these draconian, VAWA paid, marching orders to the judiciary.
All the while, all of the expected oversight provisions and safety net protections of citizens rights are being destroyed by the very branch that was established to balance all others.  Our judges are being given training and instructions that are detrimental to ourselves and our families and no one is allowed, outside of the judiciary and the VAWA funded Office of Women at the DOJ, to know what our judges are being taught that gives them such free-wheeling ability to ignore the basic rights, including due process, of men and their children in our courts.
We need change, serious change.

Texas Family Judge Marching Orders


Domestic violence is criminal conduct. It is the result of a conscious choice made by one party to an intimate relationship (statistically, that party is usually male)” Hon. Diane Kiesel, Preface to Domestic Violence: Law, Policy, and Practice
Diane Kiesel

For Texas Fathers, forget all the family code and Constitutional arguments.  Here are the marching orders for judges. It is the new guidelines published on a stand alone basis. The hidden rules for judges is openly biased against men, it states this in the preface using false and a vague reference to ‘statistics’ as support for the misandry in the statement. The current peer reviewed work has shown that women are at least as culpable and violent as men in all forms of DV, but most especially they are the prime actors and participants in DV abuse of children.

These Family Law hidden rules were previously hidden in desk reference book for judges handling family law titled the Texas Bench Book.  That book of guidelines, for nearly all issues a judge would most likely experience in court, is only 442 pages. The Bench Book was bad enough against men. However the DV Bench Book turns judges against men before the case is ever heard using false and unsubstantiated vague ‘statistics’ reference by a known biased judge. The new book is extreme ex parte to the point of being openly and commercially evil.

The new book is paid for with VAWA funds. I will provide support for this statement further down this blog post.

aaa Angry Judge

To repeat myself for emphasis, this stand alone book of DV marching orders for judges in handling family cases even states its bias against men in the opening statements in the preface.

“Domestic violence is criminal conduct. It is the result of a conscious choice made by one party to an intimate relationship (statistically, that party is usually male)”

This is openly declared misandry.

In that original Texas Bench Book and the newly published 1033 page Texas Domestic Violence Bench Book are these hidden rules that are used to ambush and surprise fathers in the middle of protecting children from maternal abuse.  Have no hesitation, Domestic Violence is, also, maternal abuse of children. 

In the Texas Domestic Violence Bench Book you will find why hearing go so wrong in the face of evidence and even admissions by women of crimes against men and children. It will give you insight into the open hostility of judges to even decent fathers. The preface defines who the victims are (women) and who the perpetrators nearly always are (men). It is right down the NY radfem policy guidelines.
A Angry Judge

It only gets worse from there.  The above statement defines males as the ones with all the ‘dangerous’ qualities and women with none of them (except in the rare cases where a judge can not shift blame to a man).

We, now, have access to this codex of crime against fathers and children by the courts.  This codex of judicial crime against men and children can be found in The Texas Family Violence Bench Book.

 

These bench books for Texas Judges can be googled and found with the simple word clouds “Texas Bench Book” and “Texas Domestic Violence Bench Book”.

Every state will have a similar book. These books on Family Law with the hidden rules for judges decisions are created with special VAWA grants provided through the DOJ as is stated in the first paragraph of an opening letter from the Texas Chief Supreme Court Justice, Wallace B. Jefferson at the very front of the Texas Family Law Bench Book.

The Hon. Diane Kiesel is known as an extremely biased judge. Why would it surprise anyone that a quote is taken from a Municipal Court Judge in NYC as a statement of great import in the preface to the most important text to your children in the State of Texas.

Here is a quote on the opinion of Diane Kiesel:
“Kiesel is so openly pro prosecution, so astonishingly biased, and so relentlessly nasty that even assistant district attorneys quietly acknowledge it – and they use it, steering almost all of their cases before her toward bench rather than jury trials. When confronted by a touch case, or a recalcitrant witness, they simply “reduce the case.” That is, they cleanly and tactically lower the charges from class A misdemeanors to class B misdemeanors, depriving the defendant of a jury trial but not the possibility of a jail sentence.

Source: David Feige. Indefensible: One Lawyer’s Journey into the Inferno of American Justice. New York: Little, Brown, and Company. 2006. Excerpted from Chapter 10. Reprinted with permission.” The full article can be found here.

Here are additional Bench Books that are relevant to fathers and their battles with family courts:

http://texaschildrenscommission.gov/media/16497/BenchBook.pdf This bench book was made publically accessible on Dec. 20, 2013.

Grievance Against Galvan, Alcala, Adams


Following this brief prologue is a copy of the actual background narrative and grievance filed against Judge Bobby Galvan and others through the Texas Sunset Commission at it’s public hearing on review of the Judicial Conduct Commission (JCC).  The JCC is up for review and is under intense scrutiny for the rogue and tyrannical actions of Texas Judges without accountability.  

In regards to the grievant, at the mother’s request, I have not included the videos provided to the Sunset Commission showing her son testifying and being interviewed by professionals as the boy stands firm in his allegations that a judge, his father, and named attorneys tried to get him to make false sex abuse allegations.  The mother is concerned about the child’s safety and privacy.   That request is being honored. 

The request is honored, though the videos show the child’s consistency in statements and in the case of being intensely interrogated with leading and very authoritarian questions by one of the alleged conspirators, Lanette Joubert, the boy was unwavering.   Lanette Joubert, one of the ‘alleged’ conspirators, very firmly asks the 6 year old boy, “I WASN’T THERE WAS I?”  to which the little boy bravely answered, “Yes you were.”. 

The little boy has been unflappable in his contention that these conspirators were attempting to get him to lie about his mommy, even though he had no grasp of how destructive the lie about ‘bad touches’ and watching ‘mommy in bed with David’ (the mother’s attorney) could result in lengthy prison terms for mommy and David.  ‘Mommy and David’ would have been convicted on only the statements of a child under pressure from those present, Daddy, unethical attorneys, a powerful judge, and the boys police sargeant uncle in uniform.   My child at the age of 4 told me of being spanked for not saying ‘bad things about daddy’.   My daughter was regularly punished at a very early age for not helping her mother with her plots to falsely imprison me.  My daughter withstood secret interviews by at least two judges.  My daughther withstood Lanette’s employees efforts to extract a false allegation from my child in Lanette’s visitation center.  I eventually shut down her center in a Federal Civil Rights action in the Victoria, Texas Federal Court.  And later, as covered below, in another matter, obtained a sanction through the BAR against Lanette Joubert for unethical behavior to her own clients. It seems, as a matter of public record,  Ms. Joubert will burn her own clients as readily as her opponents in false allegations and schemes for profit.  Others have come forward with similar evidence against Ms. Joubert and two of her cronies.

I believe the child, the waiters, and the table ticket that corroborates the event the child describes.   From what my public record experiences are with Galvan and his good friend William Kelly, the opposition attorney, jailing me for paying ahead on child support; placing my child with a man-hating social worker who was used exclusively by the local prosecutor to create allegations against men in un-recorded interviews of children and whose stated goal was to have my daughter tell me that she did not want to continue visitation to improve my child’s confidence, while not addressing my ex continuing to place my child around her convicted molester; and watching as William Kelly forcefully screamed at Judge Galvan with complete impugnity for a good 5 minutes demanding the judge jail me even longer for having paid ahead on child support to his client.   I believe Judge Bobby Galvan to be quite capable of what the child has alleged and the witnesses and evidence indicates.

Below is the body of the grievance with links to some of the more direct evidence provided to the Sunset Review Commission.

 

GRIEVANCE AGAINST THE HONORABLE BOBBY GALVAN, TEXAS DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS

GRIEVANCE AGAINST THE HONORABLE WILLIAM ADAMS, COUNTY COURT AT LAW, ARANSAS COUNTY, TEXAS

GRIEVANCE AGAINST VISITING JUDGE ALCALA

Please find the following background and Judicial Complaint against Judge Bobby Galvan for his alleged collusion in witness tampering and child abuse (enticing a child to falsely accuse an innocent parent). 

Further neither Judge William Adams nor Judge Alcala, who have been presented more evidence than is used to put many men on death row, did not act for the safety of the child. 

Judge William Adams of Youtube child beating infamy and Judge Alcala, should they have not reported to the judicial review authorities, the actions of Judge Galvan as came into their knowledge, both violated judicial ethics rules and colluded with Judge Galvan to create false allegations against innocent parties for self-aggrandizing benefit.

This is a regular pattern and practice in the general Corpus Christi, central Gulf Coast area, determined by a Civil Trial Lawyers group to be the second most judicially corrupt area of the U.S, second only to Dade County, Florida.   Three attorneys seem to be at the heart of most of the more egregious abuses in Family Law in this area, regularly and openly colluding with certain judges in the area.

In the Jennifer Flores-Lamb case we have judges assisting cronies in activity that is not just unethical, but has felony criminal implications in the actions alleged of Judge Bobby Galvan, attorneys Lanette Joubert, William Dudley, and William Kelly.    We have a judge, Aransas County Court at Law Judge William Adams, who is ruling that it is not relevant that the father’s desired ‘New Mother’ for his child who will be caring for the child 5 to 6 days a week for over 12 hours a day is HOMOCIDAL, SUICIDAL, HALLUCINATORY, PART TIME PSYCHOTIC, REGULARLY HOSPITALIZED BY THE STATE AS A THREAT TO HERSELF AND OTHERS AND EXTREMELY HEAVILY MEDICATED WHEN NOT TRYING TO KILL HERSELF OR OTHERS. (author’s recent note for Blog readers: This testimony  begins on page 98 of the transcript at 20101011 Transcript Part 2.)

Followed, in the same hearing, were sanctions against the child’s mother and attorney for addressing this early exposed effort to create false sex abuse allegations.   This is a pattern that is well documented.  The attorney’s alleged at the meeting have done this to innumerable innocent parents over the past twenty years.  At this time there is another case of an attorney who is suing for having been knowingly falsely accused by one of these same attorneys with involvement by these same three attorneys in the Titus Mata case.

In the past 17 years of battling the same three attorneys, who have involved the three judges in this complaint, and other crony judges in an effort to protect my child from her convicted serial child abuser in my ex’s family and in defending myself from strategic false allegations against me by these unethical players, I have spent more time in court than most trial lawyers.   In 2003, alone, I spent 41 days in court when the court was only open a reported 162 days that year.  The allegations against me count into at least a thousand over 17 years.  The costs to my daughter, family, friends, State coffers, etc.    have been horrendous.  All for the edification and minor enrichment of the three attorney’s in the Titus Mata abuse allegations.

I have watched men sentenced to life and to long prison terms on less evidence and no child’s statement than what was presented by Jennifer Flores-Lamb and Mr. David Sibley on this effort to falsely accuse by Judge Galvan, Mr William Dudley, Mr. William Kelly, and Mrs. Lanette Joubert.

Attorneys and the process become extremely abusive and dangerous to the innocent when Judge’s are not held accountable for what they allow in their courts or what they themselves do.

I have been a victim of many of these same efforts to falsely criminalize me.   I am even working on a manuscript to track the common pattern of false allegations.  This corruption is where attorneys work in conjunction with cronies in the judiciary to knowingly assist in false allegations and even to make the allegations themselves.   It is only with a team effort that I and other(s) have survived.   We have several instances of this in my case and others we have observed an in which we have assisted.  

I have had judges ordering me to stop taping exchanges where I was protected by having the recordings of the dates and times of the false violence allegations and even false sexual assault allegations.  

I have had judges state I could be making child porn by taping exchanges of my child where my ex was calling the police on the average of every third time we had to meet to exchange our child.   More time was spent trying to find a time and date where I was not documented than in protecting my child from regular exposure to her molester and other child abusers, as testified by my ex, in her family.

I have had one judge removed from my case and reportedly from any State bench for two years.   Judge Henry Schuble was sanctioned for secret orders in my case while the vast majority of secret orders with secret hearings with no notice were and are completely ignored by the Judicial Review Process.    It was too little, too late.   My daughter was a teenager and three recent psychologists stated she had probably continued to be abused up into her current memory.   Her cousin was convicted of molesting her at her second birthday party.

I have a capias for my arrest that has been in my file for the last 10 years from a secret contempt hearing with no notice on file.   The capias has not been processed.  It was for not paying an ad litem, Jeanette Cantu-Bazar’s bill for what she had testified were false reports of sexual assault of my child that Jeanette had fabricated, along with claims to have interviewed witnesses with whom she had never actually talked.  Jeanette was the sister-in-law of William Kelly, my ex’s attorney. 

I have had Judge Rose Vela sign a fraudulent felony conviction order where no notice of hearing had been given, no hearing held, and no evidence given before her.  Yet, I have no felony on my record at this time.  The order is still sitting in my file, #97-2091 in the Nueces County Courthouse.   I complained to the judicial review commission and there was nothing done.

These are only two examples of the abuses committed by judges colluding with a particular group of three attorneys in the Corpus area.   I was being punished for not abandoning my child to my ex and her pedophile family members.   My ex testified that the molestation of our daughter at the age of two was both “humorous” and “appropriate” in the day before our divorce was final.  My ex had moved in with the family member convicted of serial pedophilia before the divorce was over.   I was given visitation over 50% of my child’s time, “To protect your child”, but my ex was given custody so I had no authority. 

This would not be done with accountability methods in place.

This family relationship was only recently discovered (between William Kelly and Jeanette Cantu-Bazar).   Jeanette made the false allegations against me while she was a Corpus Christi Municipal Court Judge, appointed through the efforts of city councilman William Kelly.   The judicial review system and the Bar both ignored the perjuries and frauds of Jeanette and the many other judges and same three attorneys, Kelly, Joubert, and Dudley,  that were documented through her own court room testimony and admissions.

On another occasion, I had a psychologist who was a friend and drinking buddy of Judge Henry Schuble, state he believed an allegation against me of sexual abuse of a child.  However, that psychologist stated to me and my attorney that he only did it for political reasons.  He wanted more business from the judge and William Kelly.   We got him to admit to this under oath.

I had Lanette Joubert sanctioned by the Bar for some of her egregious acts against me in relation to this false allegation and others.  Mrs. Joubert routinely represents first one party then the other and making false allegations against the first party she represented.  The Bar document notifying me of this is attached and labeled “Bar Notice….” .   The sanction was a $600 assessment for the Bar’s attorney and a requirement to take an ethics class.   Ms. Joubert was rewarded for her abuses by not having any real or lasting sanction to send others a message.   I have since witnessed Ms. Joubert use the exact same unethical behavior in another case and have obtained the transcript of her open court admissions of conflict of interest against a prior paying client, who was objecting.  Ms. Joubert was allowed to continue in her gross conflict of interest by this additional judge.

I have documented 8 others whose complaints for the exact same acts fell on deaf ears with the Bar and the local judges allow her to abuse litigants with impunity.   She destroys families.   This is done in collusion with various judges in the area who laughingly allow extreme abuses of the process and system.  If there were accountability for the judge’s, most of these victims may actually have a running chance.

William Dudley admitted to me, David Sibley, Dr. Beckham, and others that he was knowingly abusing my child and admitted this before Judge Henry Schuble who laughed and was entertained by this as Judge Henry Schuble

Included in the attached DVD is a campaign brochure,  with an attorney’s affidavit testifying to William Kelly’s efforts to remove me from my child’s life and hand my child over completely to my ex and her family members who had already been convicted of molesting my child and other children and alleged to have molested even my ex and her sister as children.   The brochure was in Mr. Kelly’s first election run for Corpus Christi City council.  

Mr. Kelly had Judge Henry Schuble order me gagged and to destroy my brochures.   I had to destroy 3,000 of them.  Kelly won by only 800 votes, the smallest margin in nearly two decades for council seat in Corpus.  The gag order on me is covered in a text book, “Taken Into Custody”  that was on best seller lists for nearly two years, written by a political science professor, Dr. Stephen Baskerville.  This is the same Mr. Kelly allegedly at the restaurant with Titus.

I understand the process and these particularly criminal attorneys and judges.

Titus Mata, a child, and Jennifer Flores-Lamb, the mother:

I wish to report through the Sunset Commission, evidence and testimony alleging a Texas District Judge  was actively participating in an effort to intimidate a child into making a false allegation against his mother and her attorney.   The judge was stated to have been acting in collusion with an attorney that all in the area acknowledge the judge provides preferential rulings and almost exclusive appointments of financially lucrative assignments.  The attorney is William Kelly, the stated close friend of Judge Galvan. 

I and others have witnessed Kelly screaming at Judge Galvan for several minutes in open court with complete impunity.    I believe the actions in the Titus Mata case are the common patterns and practices of the attorneys and Judges involved.

Mr. Kelly has been involved in the sanctioning of one judge, Henry Schuble and public embarrassment of other judges, yet, continues to insinuate himself into the graces of other judges, such as Galvan, to embarrass and endanger his career.

Ms. Flores-Lamb, Jennifer, has been punished and fined for stopping a false allegation from developing against her.  The false allegation process was discovered early.   Jennifer and her attorney made every effort to expose this criminal activity.  They were fined for their efforts but did not face the severe criminal charges for which they were being set-up.

I have watched and assisted in the defense of Ms. Flores-Lamb as the same three attorney’s, Kelly, Joubert, and Dudley, working with colluding judges have begun the process of criminalizing not just Ms. Florez-Lamb, but also, her attorney David Sibley.   I have lived through 14 known efforts to accuse me of child sexual assault.   I have survived thousands of false allegations of DV, stalking, harassment, etc.  by video and audio recording all interactions with my ex-wife and mother of my child.  She once testified to making 50 false allegations against me in one two week period of time to at least three different law enforcement agencies and the Texas CPS.   The judges were entertained, yet refused to protect my child from her convicted molester or me from the false allegations used to attempt to keep me from discovering the abuses and endangerments of my child.

A child’s testimony, just as in many sex offenses against children, was what exposed an alleged plot by several attorney’s, a sitting Texas District Judge, and the child’s father.   The plot was to have the child state that the child had been sexually touched by the mother and had been made to watch the child’s mother and attorney in bed.

On Saturday, September 18, 2010, Titus Mata was taken to his favorite restaurant, near his father’s home.  They went there to have lunch with a number of individuals.  The child, in his own words in the videos,  clearly states who was present.   In the video labeled “Titus on Seating Arrangement”, (at the mother’s request the videos showing her son are only available to the authorities concerned) the child, Titus Mata, son of Andrew Mata and Jennifer Flores-Lamb, explains who sat in what location at the table where Titus states Judge Bobby Galvan, Lanette Joubert, William Dudley, and William Kelly sat.   This video was taken Thursday, September 26, 2010.

Two waiters attended that particular table on the date and time Titus stated he and his father met with Judge Galvan, Lanette Joubert, William Kelly, William Dudley, and Titus’ Uncle, a Corpus Christi Police sergeant named ‘Junior’.   Both waiters recognized Titus.  One was out of town at the time of the October 11, 2010 hearing where this matter was first raised before the court.  The other testified at that hearing and his testimony is attached in the transcript provided titled 20101011_Transcript_Part_2(1).  This second waiter corroborated the child’s statement as to seating arrangements of the child and the other people at the table.   The waiter corroborated the correct number of people at that table.  The testifying waiter testified to recognizing the child and father as regulars at that restaurant.

The owner of the restaurant, Mandarin Gardens, in Corpus Christi, provided a copy of the table ticket for the exact date and time Titus stated the meeting was held where efforts were made to get him to make a false allegation against his mother and her attorney.  This ticket, which was admitted into evidence in the October 10, 2010 hearing is included in the DVD, and is titled Restaurant_Ticket[1]Mr. David Sibley, one of the targets of the alleged effort to create false allegations against Jennifer and himself, upon hearing of the child’s allegations against these adults recommended the employment of a forensic pediatric psychologist, Dr. Barbara Beckham.  Dr. Beckham interviewed Titus.  This interview is on the video labeled “Beckham_Interview”  provided in the CD with this report. 

Dr. Beckham testified in the October 11, 2010 hearing as to the determined truthfulness of Titus in his statements.   Dr. Beckham’s testimony can be found in (1) on pages 108  through page 121

Judge William Adams of the Youtube child beating infamy, was the judge sitting in this hearing.   He had sanctioned Mr. Sibley for subpoenaing records from attorney William Dudley and ordered Mr. Sibley to pay Mr. Dudley a considerable sum.   It was not disclosed at that time that Judge Adams had employed Mr. Dudley for the judge’s own custody case of a daughter who was younger than the M.S. afflicted child he was recorded beating.

Here are the judge’s own words, taken from  20101011_Transcript_Part_2(1)

“I find that the allegations in your motion,

most of them, Mr. Sibley, are baseless and groundless.

And I’m just rereading the supplemental motion that you

filed. And I didn’t hardly hear any evidence of

anything that you alleged in the motion. About the only

thing I did hear was the waiter from the restaurant

could identify the child, the child’s father at the

restaurant on that particular day. But he could not say

whether or not these other lawyers and a judge were

there. And I don’t have any evidence, whatsoever, that

they were there. And those are really, really strong

allegations for you to make without being able to back

them up.

I’m not going to grant your motion.

And I’m very tempted to go ahead and change the custody over

on a temporary basis. However, I’m going to keep the

status quo right now.”

Following the above hearing, after a series of legal efforts, Mr. Sibley managed to get Titus to be allowed to testify before Judge Alcala.   This public record, unsealed video, is included in the DVD under the title “Titus_Interview_with_Judge_Alcala_Present”.

 The testimony of the mother on the child’s utterances have sent many a man to prison for life, but if the alleged abuser is a judge, then the mother is fined and her child taken, where there is more than enough evidence to convict or to at least start a more serious criminal investigation by law enforcement.

 I have testified in the Titus Mata case as to pattern and practice and in impeachment of one of the witness/attorneys in this affair.   I can provide impeachment documentation and transcripts on all parties, including Judge Galvan.

I wish to file this as a grievance and as a witness statement.  I state that the information contained herein is as true and accurate as I am able to determine.

Thank you for allowing me to participate in this very important and very serious deliberation.

 Sincerely,

 Stanley A. Rains, Jr.

Where All the Good Men Are, And Kay Hymowitz Has No Clue.


A critique of “Where Have All the Good Men Gone” by Kay M. Hymowitz:

Dear MS. Kay M. Hymowitz,

In response to the Wall Street Journal article of  February 2011, The Good Men are avoiding you like the plague and the only men willing to court the feminist black widows are the men willing to risk being served up as a  life ending midnight knosh.  Ironically, the vast majority of women who destroy the fathers of their children end up as prey to the legal system and to their own offspring who suck the life from their own mother through the children’s life long bitterness, addictions, prostitution, violence, and worse.   One only has to research the prognosis of single mother children for addictions, prostitution, imprisonment, etc… What man wants to have children he will not be able to raise or see while they are growing up? What man wants to have children who are ten times more likely to prostitutes, drug addicts or sex offenders? And you wonder why men are walking away?

This tragedy of single mother raised children happens at all economic levels.   The very wealthy gold-digger’s children have the same tragic prognosis as the ghetto welfare mother’s children.  The futures of the children of  both are statistically very very bleak with the least of problems being serial relationships and marriages.

Kay Hymowitz is getting close for a feminist, but she still doesn’t get it.   She keeps laying the blame on the men even when she admits her sister feminists are beating up the men.    MS. Hymowitz seems to think her power mad sister feminists are equals to men in so many arenas.   She should research more carefully the entitlements of job preferences, education preferences, famliy law preferences, etc…, at the expense of taxpayer’s and individual men’s wallets is an acceptable proposition.    She can’t even get the foundation of her argument quite right. Women are not equal, they are propped up by massive infusions of governmental cash and quotas that must be met or subject employers, schools, professions to civil and criminal persecutions. And, after the fun wears off the elitist women who have destroyed so many resources for their empty image of professionalism just pack up and go home. Over half of them are back at home in under 12 years. What is the cost to industry, tax payors, and the men’s incomes that these entitled women wasted, spent and destroyed.  

In reference to Kay’s rather shallow and superficial approach to her work titled “Where Have All The Good Men Gone?”  and “Manning Up.” Has she stopped to look, critically, within when it comes to the men in her life?  

If I were to have a discussion with Kay on this topic, my points would go something like this:

You believe manning up is paying for some slick tramps bills for the rest of her life while he is lucky to get spam on Fridays, instead of his daily Ramen Noodles.   Is the feminist vagina so golden and his penis so dirty as to justify a man’s life-time enslavement to a once upon a time lover or ex-wife?   Why don’t you start telling your sisters to ‘WOMAN UP’ and be responsible for their own lives and bad decisions.

 How can you, as a feminist, hope for  anything but an emotionally armed truce for mutual transient needs when you are so hyper-critical of men and continuing to demand the many things that women want from men?  

If the courts and legislature mandated a woman provide for a man’s needs for life once she divorces or once she sleeps with him, how crazy would that sound to the feminists of Kay S. Hymowitz circles?   How loud would you and your puerile femi-sisters scream?   Yet they demand the courts and government provide that very enslavement of men to the entitled feminist.    Kay S. you are intellectually dishonest.

Misandry, as with misogyny is a form of self-loathing.   And, you reek of self-loathing in your attacks on the wisdom of men avoiding predatory, ungrateful, and faithless women.  You make men even more cautious around the large numbers of decent women who are still out there.    But, yet, we are boys for not charging, lemming like, over the cliffs of matrimony in to the unforgiving cold sea below or to be like male paramours of black widow spiders who become the after sex snack of a cold and uncaring mate who will herself be fed upon by her brood.   You, Kay Hymowitz, are emotionally dishonest.

You envy what the decent women have, a caring supportive and financially supporting man who loves the woman and the children he gives her.   But you want it without the entanglement of actually getting to know or respect a man.  You espouse wanting to take the man’s children, money, home, respect, family, and anything else you can steal and pry from his still live fingers and then wonder why men avoid you and your feminist sisters with whom you surround yourself?   You are dishonest and misleading to the vast majority of your own gender.

You surround yourself with man-haters, you write man-hate articles and books, and then you want men to worship you and decent men to flock to you for you to pick and chose amongst them for the one who you think will complete you the most?

Are you crazy?  

That was not rhetorical.   Anyone who has taken their college freshman liberal blinders off will tell you that you don’t attack victims by warning them of your scam ahead of time.   You don’t put up traffic signs to  inform “This Way to be Hijacked” , or “Roadside Piracy 2 Miles Ahead”.    I’m sorry, but you just did put up your roadsigns, didn’t you?

And you say these men are not ‘Manning Up’ because they do not take the Hijack or Piracy exits?  

You are crazy to think you deserve the fruits of someone else’s labor without quid pro quo.   You are crazy to think the smart and capable will buy into your plan to destroy them, their offspring (look at the prognosis for children raised by your single feminist sisters) and possibly end their life (15,000 men a year commit suicide from loss of family, children, home, etc.  in our family courts) just to fund your Narcissistic self-destructive life-styles.     And, men have become mere boys for not ‘Manning Up’ eagerly for your sadistic and torturous treatments.

How much arrogance can feminism contain?    Are all believing they are each and everyone a Helen of Troy when in statement and deed they are Medeas?

How can you ever be sure the very personal rejection your feminist compatriots sexual charms isn’t just a self-defense reaction from the men you attack?  Could it be that your physical sexual attributes that women like to over-value, do not overcome your advertising yourself as a female equivalent of a preying mantis ready to prey upon and feed upon the very father of her children?  

How can you not understand the basics of ‘Risk to Reward’ decision making process of men?  There are even mathmatical algorithms to minutely quantify this decision making process.   Yet you ignore the factor of self preservation.   

Why should any man, who is much more emotionally, financially, and psychologically self-contained, risk total and absolute destruction of himself and any children he gives a feminist when he can have a full and fun life without the heartaches and impoverishment feminism brings men, women, and children?  

You  have written and been published  in the context of racial social policy what single motherhood portends for the children and the duped single mothers in the Black ghetto.  Your racism shows through when you can not apply the same near objectivity  to your white middle-class feminist sisters.

It is not the men who have embraced a culturally new ideology of gender warfare, government whoredom of women with welfare, and enforced system entitlements, but the women who have built a world view based on feminist myth of all men as violent rapists and a demand for a total lack of personal accountability for the feminists’ own life decisions, violence, sex offenses against men and children, etc…. 

As the ideology of feminism is being rejected more and more by the larger number of women in this country, we see the die-hard feminists begin to moderate their statements of misandry and begin to speak of women as equals to men all things male, but maintain strict boundaries on all things female.

Feminism is the ultimate female movement for dependence and entitlement. It is a movement of slavers.

Feminist policy goals are to make someone else, a man, the government, society, anybody, responsible for their discontent and desired lifestyle level.

To be dependent for life is foremost and premier as the underlying dogma of all feminist effort.  This is true, whether a man is supposed to ‘man up’ and provide a woman her every need at her every whim or a government to pay a woman’s way while she looses count of the men’s shoes under her bed as she ‘sucks’ them in and then discards them like yesterday’s banana peel.  This demanded dependency is such that no woman is to be held accountable, only some man, even if he is a stranger, is supposed to “Man up”.

Sexual Promiscuity is a process that the feminist recruit has been told will ‘sexually liberate’ her,  especially if she experiments with homosexuality.   Yet these perverse, risky, and self-destructiveactions leave her with a feeling of degradation and self-loathing she transfers in a defensive reflex into blaming men.  Feminist avoid responsibility by blaming men for the feminists’ own bad decisions.   Accountability only counts for men.   

Feminists are so angry at men because when the feminist demands for ultimate and totally unaccountable female relationship and financial power became too heavy a trade-off, the men walked.  Slaves aren’t supposed to be able to walk, so they must be punished and demeaned. Women have been peripheral in men’s lives.

Kay Hymowitz is first and foremost among the more popular pseudo-intellectual who has made a career of demeaning men, accusing men of avoiding women after watching their fathers and grandfathers stripped of home, children, family, and wealth by some faithless woman.

Men have never needed a woman ‘to complete’ them, or we would not have adventurers, sailors, or early world trade caravans.  We would still be sitting in the savannah waiting for some predator to come and eat our slower members, the very young, elderly, or pregnant women. As women demand evermore enslavement of men, politically, culturally, socially, legally, emotionally and financially, men, as men in the ghettos have done, walk.

What sane man will build permanent ties with a woman who espouses man-hate, man-abuse, and man-enslavement. Hello? Any one home over there at the feminist encampment?  

When feminists become mothers and do not appreciate the gifts men bring, every thing the man does will cause the feminist to be angry no matter how supportive or enriching the man’s acts are towards the feminist..   As with any Narcissistic woman, she will be angry if the children get too much attention, the birthday gift was less than $10,000, not buy her the newest SUV or if he asks her to cut back on her twice a week day spa. The woman retaliates with divorce that forces wage slavery and punitive measures on a man who gave his all for giving his all. This will show him, it will destroy his career, create a tragic prognosis for the children’s adulthoods, and impoverish all. But, by God she showed him how mighty she is. Now, in a divorce, the courts will state that he must provide for the family and his ex as if he were still receiving all of the benefits of his marriage plus pay her attorneys who stole from the family as a whole, plus carry another home, plus pay for ‘visits’ with his own children, plus, plus, plus….. Just this one factor will drive many of the more intelligent and capable single young men away from marriage, commitment, and family.

Yet, we have so many more factors than those listed above to describe where Feminism, not women as a whole, has incentivized men to forego what they would like but do not have to have, a wife and children. Feminist have worked at detracting from the gifts a man brings to a relationship, not as another woman, but as an emotional counter weight to the realities of women’s hormonally driven emotions and to the economic support so that women can have the privilege of the financial, emotional, sexual and cultural security a man brings to a relationship. It is when a woman honors a man for what he provides of himself to her and any children that he gives of himself, completely. I do not hear Kay begin to honor men for what they bring to the table, she can only demean it.

Why should any man honor a woman with a lifelong commitment of support when she demeans him and his gender as well as the many gifts he brings. Feminists are such spoiled little children who have long ago lost all appreciation of others.

Ms Hymowitz, your self-professed feminism  is an ideology of Narcissism.  Feminists will breed themselves into non-existence (or it would be better stated they will not be bred into the future.) Feminism is an already dying ideology of personal tyranny.  How ironic and shallow that feminists call the men who rightfully avoid these feminists, Narcissists. 

You should look past the blind inconsistencies of feminism and then you will find what you really want, a partner and a friend who you can trust respect and to whom you are trustworthy and respectful.  You will be able to answer your former feminist sisters, “All The Good Men Are Hiding From You.”

Texas Rangers -Just One More Criminal Complaint against Judge Adams


In this blog is a copy of a criminal complaint from August 2011 against Judge Adams.  As I have stated, repeatedly,   Judge Adams was not abusive in a vacuum and  he does not act alone.   He can only abuse with the tacit approval of other judges and various law enforcement agencies.   Any of them could have at least slowed the judge down on his path of destruction through a county in South Texas without removing him from the bench.  But none would hold him accountable.  

It has been said that two judges from two surrounding counties once visited Judge Adams asking him to lay off of the abuse he heaped on a quadraplegic prosecutor in Aransas County.   Judge Adams ignored the two Texas District Judges.   Why does that not surprise anyone?

Following this paragraph is a copy of the complaint made to the Texas Rangers by David Sibley against Judge William Adams.   The complaint was made three months ago.   I have replaced the names of the two witnesses quoted in the complaint to X and Y to protect them from retaliation by the Judge and his cronies.  The complaint is about Judge Adams alleged efforts in an open courtroom, before numerous witnesses, to have an Aransas County Prosecuter ‘CREATE’ allegations against Mr. David Sibley. 

Mr. Sibley, an attorney at law, has been attempting to draw attention to the judicial abuses committed by Judge Adams as he favors friends and ignores law.  

There is great harm to innocent individuals and in the general public’s trust in our courts when a judge gone bad acts in an openly criminal and extremely arrogant manner in his courtroom.   

****************************************************************************************************************

David A. Sibley

Attorney At Law

08/11/11

Via rangers@dps.texas.gov  Texas Rangers

Re: Judge William Adams

County Court at Law Judge, Aransas County, Texas;.

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

This is a criminal complaint against Judge William Adams, County Court at Law, Aransas County, Texas. I have known about this crime for some time. However, I did not eye witness it, and I didn’t know whether the eye witness would be willing to talk in public.

The eye witness is an attorney who practices in Judge Adams’ Court. The eye witness obviously subjects himself to retaliation by giving his testimony. Judge Adams has a history of retaliation and dishonesty. He uses various state agencies to assist him in retaliation.

However, I ran across the witness at a restaurant last night. He was upset at Judge Adams because Judge Adams had been rude to him. Apparently, Judge Adams was impatient at getting a plea done. This witness was trying to explain the 4 sets of plea papers to his client who he had represented for only 1 day (it is of course the job of a lawyer to make sure the client understands plea papers). Judge Adams was impatient and rude among other things saying things like “just sign the papers.” Judge Adams is disrespectful of litigants.

I hate to get somebody involved because I know Judge Adams will retaliate, but I simply asked X if he would speak out about what he told me months ago. He said yes. He is a very stand up guy. His name is X. He is a lawyer with his office in Portland.

The background is last October Judge Adams was very abusive towards my client and myself. His actions went beyond a bad day or poor performance. His conduct amounted to abuse of my client, a child, and myself. He was retaliatory and dishonest. I complained about his behavior in a number of ways including the judicial conduct commission.

X knew nothing about those events and really still doesn’t. He knows very little still. I first learned about what X witnessed from a friend named Y. As I recall, X and Y somewhere were talking. X knows that Y  is my friend. X told Y that Judge Adams is trying to have David Sibley arrested and that David Sibley should be careful. Y told me this.

A short later I ran across X at the Butter Churn in Aransas Pass. I asked him about what Walter had said. X told me that Judge Adams was sitting on the bench in open court telling the County Attorney (or assistant county attorney) to charge me with a crime (I think disorderly conduct). Judge Adams was claiming to be scared of me or something. You will have to talk to X and the County Attorney (or assistant) to get the details. The fact is that I have done nothing to Judge Adams other than complain about  his corrupt and dishonest behavior in writing (which is not a crime).

Since these controversies have started, I have only seen Judge Adams once and that was in the hallway of the public courthouse with lots of people around. I wouldn’t be around him without witnesses because I know him to be dishonest and retaliatory. I also know him to have a family law mentality (which routinely involves false accusations and feigned “fear”). I know he made an accusation of violence or threat against another lawyer some years ago (Jeff Dietz). I don’t know whether that was true or false but I see a potential pattern here.

The fact is that there was no basis whatsoever for Judge Adams attempting to start a criminal charge against me. He was retaliating and he was filing a false report (both crimes). The County Attorney is law enforcement. He was making a false report to her (I believe it was a “her”). He was retaliating against me because I complained about his judicial behavior. His behavior amounts to things like 1) filing a false report, 2) official oppression, and 3) retaliation. You’ll need to get the details from X and the County Attorney (or assistant). I believe X, and I also know this is consistent with other things Judge Adams has done. He has been retaliating because I have complained about his judicial behavior. He retaliated against my client because my client reported crimes committed by some lawyers who are obviously his friends (these lawyers were trying to get a child to lie about his mother that his mother “touched” him among other devious lies). Thanks.

Respectfully,

/s David A. Sibley

Judge William Adams Suing for Custody of ‘Other’ Daughter


The Corpus Christi Caller Times, this morning, 11/3/11, in a front page article states that Judge Adams is using attorney William Dudley to sue Mrs. Adams,  for custody of their younger ‘other’ daughter.

If Dudley is involved you can expect false sex abuse allegations against Mrs. Adams and everyone on her side.  This includes opposition attorneys and will possibly involve other judges participating in and colluding with Dudley on making false allegations.   

I will be posting a redacted video of the deposition of a 7 year old boy describing a meeting where the boy’s father took this child to a restaurant meeting with a Texas District Judge,  attorney Lynette Joubert and the description of William Dudley and Dudley’s very unique, possibly one of a kind cowboy boots featuring the profiles in bright green of reclining cowgirls.   The child calls them ‘Girlie Boots” for very good reason.

We can expect more South Texas Color in this custody case than when the Duke of Duval County, just South of Corpus, had the local cemetery vote for Lyndon Johnson with the swing votes that got good ole’ Lyndon the U.S. Senate Seat.

You can always count on South Texas for ironic and sometimes downright macabre humor.  Unless of course you have to live there with the crooked and the all too often life destroying psychopathic acting judiciary creating these bizarre and unlikely stories.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 25 other followers