A fellow activist sent me an article I found particularly poignant on the issue of children losing loving, protective fathers to out of control PC courts. I couldn’t stop myself from responding (obviously I have issues with OCD but that is for another blog at a later date)
Subject: Re: [MichDads] Mandatory joint custody | A Family Court judge’s view
Thank you for the post. Another thought on this same article to which you link; the statistics of men folding easily, points to the reason for the increased power of the feminist family law courts. For each one of those men who listened to the feminist oriented attorneys with their threats of what the judge will do if the man actually fights for his children; for each one who abdicated his children for the sake of temporary peace and security, those men have made it ten times, no a hundred times harder and more expensive for those of us who will fight for our children’s safety and well being.
These men who fight know that their children are in harms way and are willing to do what matters. The Quislings just set up the good men for a hard fall.
The children of the ‘fold-up’ men will become just some more of the children of single-mom statistics. Just a few of those statistics:
95% of all men in prison in 1995, 100% of all women in prison in
80 – 95% of all rapists and child sex offenders (including the one who molested my 2 year old daughter),
the vast majority of prostitutes, drug addicts, etc…..
We have all seen women and children who need protection from evil men. But we have seen even greater numbers of fathers and their children who receive no protection from evil women and self-serving attorneys, judges, and other officials. The women who really need it have assistance. The men and children just get more abuse from the system. We see the general incapacity of single mothers to raise good citizens. It has become axiomatic when we apply the law of large numbers.
It is not just the feminists who are destroying our children and country, it is those men who will give up liberty and rights for themselves and their children for the appearance of a little peace and security. Those men more often than not end up with nothing, no children, no liberty, and no security. And, many men innocent of everything except fighting for the rights of their children and themselves end up in jail as a result of the myriad of entraping laws men allow to stand against other men.
Harpy Feminists and Pathetic Papas, like the Nazis and their sympathizers, would justify supporting a system that destroys us all.
If those ‘fold-up’ men did not even stand up for their own children, why do we expect them to stand up for anything. More innocent children and men will have to be destroyed and even murdered (several researchers claim up to 30,000 men a year commit suicide as a result of the family law abuse and loss of their children) by this evil agenda of man hate before men realize they do not have to be led to slaughter like cattle. They can dig in and fight.
If even 10 percent of the men who go to divorce court fought with all their resources and commitment with a willingness to be impoverished (temporary), jailed (temporary), and ridiculed (by those living in glass houses), the whole system would collapse. As it is, we have a nearly 100% ‘fold-up rate’ within the first year, even with those who start out trying to protect their children in bad situations.
I know of a single man who has in his case had sanctioned an attorney, a court reporter, a judge removed from the case and the bench, a social worker sanctioned, and more. He has fought 9 judges to a standstill in his case. He has accomplished even more. I have seen the documentation and sat in the court in that case. He has done some of this pro se when he has been impoverished. He was just a quiet little man with no big bank account and no big connections, but he loved his child with all his heart. His ex-wife had even testified to her own severe abuse and endangerment of their child and was allowed to get and keep custody. He never stopped.
I know of a man who dedicated his life, even though his children are essentially lost to him, to educating the public of this evil. and working to make legislative and judicial changes. He has set up and maintained his own tv programming out of his own middle class income and now reaches up to 40 million homes a month.
I know of another man who has repeatedly put together national class action law suits filed in every state, simultaneously.
There are many who have become journalists, authors, and attorneys just to fight this evil. But they are so few in number. The numbers are growing. The shame is that so many fold-up, sit on their asses, and cry in their beer.
These committed men are not men with money, major degrees, or family power connections, these were just a few good men, they could have been your neighbor or the guy who used to be little quiet kid who never talked in class. They were simply men who will not abandon their children to the people who will destroy their children. They are men who will commit.
How could a system stand in the face of those men, if only 10%, or even 5% would say,
“Here I stand and I will take on all comers, large or small, for the sake of my children, at all costs to myself. I will stand and support others in their stand.”
Our evil and corrupt system could not stand up even in the face of 1% of the fathers who are ground up in the system in only one month. In my county there are hundreds of divorces each month. If ten fathers committed their lives to fighting this evil and working with others to help other fathers and their children, we would have no corrupt official in office in under two years.
How many men would rather have a beer and watch a ball game than fill out a complaint form on a judge, attorney, ad litem, case worker, etc…. and then actually put a stamp on it and mail it? How many will even write a letter or email opposing new draconion legislation that is anti-father and child destructive? Too damned few. Most are too damn scared. I say to them, you deserve more abuse than you get and your children deserve a real father not you.
Nearly every single man who has been in family law court within the past two years has at least one legitimate grievance against a corrupt official, attorney, judge, or other professional, they can document and file in their own case. Every one reading this can go sit in on someone else’s case and document abuses with affidavits to help that other person file complaints. Your silence is evidence against your love for your children. The corrupt individuals have become so secure and arrogant in their criminality they no longer even bother to attempt to hide their crimes and abuses. They are easy to document and knock down, lawfully.
To those of you who do act in their own cases and to the even fewer who will stand up for others in their cases, you are truly heros of national proportions and I thank you for what you have done to keep things from being even worse on my child and me.
Darrick Scott-Farnsworth <> wrote:
From Attorney Jeanne Hannah:I had the distinct pleasure to meet Judge Jon Van Allsburg of at the recent 6th Annual Family Law Institute in Plymouth , Michigan . Judge Van Allsburg had emailed an extremely informative post to the State Bar of Michigan’s Family Law Listserv on October 12th about the proposed HB 4564 dealing with a “presumption” of joint custody. I asked Judge Van Allsburg if I could share his message with the folks who read Updates in Michigan Family Law and he graciously agreed. I appreciate Judge Van Allsburg’s contribution and his wisdom. The following is Judge Van Allsburg’s message:
Once you read the Judge¢s logic think about how it is that every FOC and Family Court judge has the ability to determine what¢s in the Best Interest of Our Children but they all seem to do it a little different? If the BIC evaluation system of assigning custody is so important then why is it not required in all cases even when parents agree to their own arraignment? Why is it that almost all cases have a custody evaluation initiated and most have one completed prior to their being a settlement on custody if most parents readily agree to have sole mother custody?