Here is a link to a section of a transcript where Judge Adams, after reviewing a homicidal, hullucinating, psychotic babysitter’s medical records in chambers with both attorney’s was keeping the medical records out. The father had repeatedly stated he was going to continue to have this babysitter watch his son up to 12 hours a day at least 6 days a week, no matter what the medical records showed. (click on blue link to see the transcript) ->. Judge Adams helps put a child in danger.
I have read and been present when the medical records of the homicidal babysitter were reviewed by the child’s psychologist. The psychologist was very distressed that the judge had intentionally kept out records of a known life-threatening danger to a child. In the transcript where it states “The Court: I hope the child doesn’t get hurt. No further questions.” Was actually Mr. Sibley’s statement. And at this point a certain small exchange was excluded by the court reporter.
Just before the quote above in this paragraph. Mr. Sibley asked, “Your honor, you mean that the babysitter for this child being homicidal is not relevent?”. In response, Judge Adams simply said, “Yep”. I was there. The court room was full. Many others were there. All were shocked.
State law and Judicial Canons required Judge Adams to protect the child from any hazard coming to his knowledge. Judge Adams violated law, in this laymen’s opinion, when he refused to protect the child. It, also, seems this typical Texas Family Law Judge became a party to criminal endangerment of this little 7 year old child. Again, just my opinion, after 20 years of intense involvement in parents’ rights advocacy in Texas.
Court Reporters are the judge’s political appointees in Texas and most States in the U.s. Court reporters do not type the full and accurate transcription of what happens when court is in session. I discovered that truth personally
Through a licensing board, I managed to get a court reporter sanctioned, Yvette Shurgart, of Victoria Texas by the Texas Court Reporter’s Certification Board. I managed to get her sanctioned for embezzling money from me and destroying a transcript of my ex-wife testifying that her mother had prostituted my ex’s older sister on the streets of Corpus Christi when that sibling was as young as 9 to 11 years of age. It was during the process of following through on my grievances, when I discovered in Texas, Court Reporters make very large incomes each year selling transcripts for rates of $1.50 to $7.50 U.S per page made with county supplies, while on county salaries, to litigants for appeal or documentation purposes, as personal income.
The transcript portion which is provided in the link above, left out considerable, but included enough to show Mr. Sibley and his client making every effort to protect a 7 year old child.
In the year since the transcripted hearing, the father was given custody of the child, the child has spent the majority of his awake hours, when not at school with the homicidal, hallucinating, sometimes psychotic babysitter. A neighbor of the homicidal babysitter video taped, as discussed in another blog entry, the boy on a busy, narrow commercial road riding his bicycle, unsupervised.
The part-time psychotic babysitter has stated she drives under the influence of extremely strong medications ranging from anti-psychotics and anti-depressants to anti-anxiety pills, since she is supposed to be taking her medications several times a day. All of these various psychotropic drugs preclude her from driving legally. I read the medical history and current list of medications while a psychologist explained what each diagnosis and medication was and how they limited the capacity of anyone to care for young children or to drive. Judge Adams was told of this in chambers with attorney’s for both parents present. That conference was only minutes prior to the transcript provided above. Judge Adams stated he did not want to see the records and he saw no relevence in presenting them in the custody case before him. The little boy’s mother and her attorney tried to protect the child without the need for publicity on the extreme mental illness and open danger to the child left alone with his homicidal, hallucinatory, and drugged up Aunt. The little boy’s Aunt had a medical record that read very similarly to what is known of Judge Adams mother, according to Hallie Adams, Judge Adams own wife.
In the case of the homicidal, part-time psychotic babysitter Judge Adams has forced the little boy’s mother and her attorney to put the Aunt’s medical history into the open public record in an effort to protect the child. As of November 28, 2011, the little boy has been in the care of the homicidal, drugged. time-bomb of a baby sitter for 13 months.
Judge Adams went a step beyond the absurd in this case. Judge Adams sanctioned the attorney and the mother for trying to protect a child the judge knew the judge was putting into danger. The judge was giving this child up to a be with a homicidal, suicidal, part-time psychotic, and hallucinating babysitter who had been repeatedly hospitalized in the recent past for the safety of the general public.
This homicidal babysitter, drugged to the gills by the State of Texas for the safety of the public, drives the boy to and from school. The boy’s school is a major portion of the distance across Corpus Christi. Good Ole’ drugged up, homicidal, suicidal, hallucinating, sometimes psychotic babysitter ( a member of the father’s family) is driving the streets of Corpus twice a day during the school year with an innocent 7 year old in the car with her.
Judge Adams not only approved, but actively worked at doing this as a favor to the attorney , Lynette Joubert, a long time cohort and co-conspirator of William Dudley, good friend and attorney for Judge William Adams.
William Dudley is the attorney who wrote and sent out the press release for Judge Adams blaming the daughter for the beating she was given. In a previous case, William Dudley has been documented loudly mocking Christianity in open court, turning chairs upside down on table while an opposition attorney was attempting to present evidence to a judge, and admitted to abusing a child to multiples of individuals including a senior pediatric forensic psychologist. After the psychologist in that case repeatedly asked William Dudley if he understood what he was saying when he said “I helped abuse this child.” , the psychologist, Dr. Barbara Beckham, filed a grievance with the Texas Bar Association for ethics violations. When the grievance was heard by the local Corpus Christi, Texas Bar grievance committee, Mr. Dudley walked into the administrative hearing and in the first 10 seconds announced that Dr. Beckham had recanted her complaint. Dr. Beckham’s attorney was present in the hearing and immediately asked to call Dr. Beckham from the adjacent waiting room. Dr. Beckham, within 60 seconds of the hearing being called stated clearly that she had definitely not recanted. William Dudley, Judge Adams current attorney, probably set a new record for proving an ethics violation against himself within 60 seconds of the hearing being called.
The Texas Bar Representative present at that local Bar hearing was Mr. James Ehler. The local Bar issued a ruling several days later that they found William Dudley had committed no violation of the Texas Bar Ethics rules for attorneys. Dr. Beckham’s attorney, David Sibley, Esq., filed a grievance against the local Bar grievance committee, including Mr. James Ehler. Mr. Ehler, in his governmental capacity has had a very apparent open vendetta against Mr. Sibley from the time of the filing against the grievance committee for ignoring the violation of ethics committed by Mr. William Dudley, during a hearing against Mr. Dudley. The grievance committee also ignored the open boasting, admissions that William Dudley had been knowingly helping to abuse a child. Mr. Dudley had made those admissions in front of four witnesses. All of whom were present and willing to testify to the Bar grievance committee. Only Dr. Beckham was called and she was ignored.
In the case of the homicidal babysitter, the father who got custody and turned his child over to the homicidal and hullucinating babysitter, testified the mother was a good mother and other than documented effort by the father to make false sex abuse allegations against the mother, there were no criticisms of the mom. (This is another well documented story about a second judge and William Dudley abusing another child) But, Judge Adams, who could have ordered, at the very least, the child not be left with the this homicidal babysitter, did not even do that. The judge must have believed that since he survived being raised by his mother, this little five year old boy could survive being raised by his hallucinating and part time psychotic Aunt.
Judge Adams, as a favor to his attorney friends, Lynette Joubert, William Dudley, and William Kelly, gave a 7 year old over to a part-time psyschotic, full-time homicidal and drugged up babysitter. All three had been party to the efforts to have the second judge intimidate a 5 year old boy into saying his mother touched him ‘bad’ and that he had been made to watch his mother and her attorney in bed. The mother and attorney had no romantic relationship. This was an attempt to create a false outcry by a child accusing the innocent mother and attorney of child sex abuse.
The second portion of the transcript exerpt gives a bit more information on these attorneys and another Judge in nearby Nueces County attempting to persuade and intimidate the 7 year old boy to falsely claim his mother touched him sexually and that the boy had been made to watch the mother and her attorney have sex in bed together. There is much more to this sordid story. It is generally typical of what is done to fathers in Texas family courts, not mothers
This is how the State of Texas handles the “Best Interest of the Child” standard which the legislature has refused to define in any manner except to leave it open for the judges in Texas to enrich themselves and their good friends.
This author is talking to the mother and her attorney in an effort to be able to post the video of the little boy on the busy highway in front of the homicidal babysitter’s house, unsupervised. The father’s babysitter for the child is nowhere in sight and often passed out on the couch while the boy wanders the street and neighborhood. Remember, not even the father who now has custody has ever stated the mother did anything wrong in the care of the child.
These medical records of the babysitter were duly subpoenaed and delivered over and received in full compliance of both Federal and State Health Information Privacy statutes and rules. These records have been filed with the Aransas County District Clerk. They are a matter of public record and in files available to the general public.
Unsealed divorce records are public accessible, except where the Aransas County District Clerk lies to the person requesting access to public files. This has been done to help Judge Adams take money form Mr. Sibley in sanctions that would not have succeeded had Mr. Sibley had full knowledge of the public record. Judge Adams has hidden from David Sibley and the mother in this case, the judge’s close personal and business ties to Lynette Joubert and William Dudley. These are serious conflicts of interest.
This is an interesting and sinister story for another time of how the Aransas County District Clerk helped to hide the public record files of Judge Adams divorce from para-legals and from attorney David Sibley, the attorney for the mother of the child in the transcripted case referenced above.
It seems Mr. Sibley was unaware of the ongoing attorney-client relationship between Adams and Dudley when Adams sanctioned Sibley for attempting to subpoena a copy of a family law text written by Dudley and William Kelly. The Aransas County District Clerk seems to have conspired with Judge Adams and William Dudley to enrich themselves with fines assessed against Mr. Sibley while denying him the public record to defend himself. Neither Judge Adams nor Dudley revealed their personal and business relationships to Mr. Sibley or to the child’s mother.
Is this how Judge Adams pays his attorney, with the fines assessed to others?