Grievance Against Galvan, Alcala, Adams


Following this brief prologue is a copy of the actual background narrative and grievance filed against Judge Bobby Galvan and others through the Texas Sunset Commission at it’s public hearing on review of the Judicial Conduct Commission (JCC).  The JCC is up for review and is under intense scrutiny for the rogue and tyrannical actions of Texas Judges without accountability.  

In regards to the grievant, at the mother’s request, I have not included the videos provided to the Sunset Commission showing her son testifying and being interviewed by professionals as the boy stands firm in his allegations that a judge, his father, and named attorneys tried to get him to make false sex abuse allegations.  The mother is concerned about the child’s safety and privacy.   That request is being honored. 

The request is honored, though the videos show the child’s consistency in statements and in the case of being intensely interrogated with leading and very authoritarian questions by one of the alleged conspirators, Lanette Joubert, the boy was unwavering.   Lanette Joubert, one of the ‘alleged’ conspirators, very firmly asks the 6 year old boy, “I WASN’T THERE WAS I?”  to which the little boy bravely answered, “Yes you were.”. 

The little boy has been unflappable in his contention that these conspirators were attempting to get him to lie about his mommy, even though he had no grasp of how destructive the lie about ‘bad touches’ and watching ‘mommy in bed with David’ (the mother’s attorney) could result in lengthy prison terms for mommy and David.  ‘Mommy and David’ would have been convicted on only the statements of a child under pressure from those present, Daddy, unethical attorneys, a powerful judge, and the boys police sargeant uncle in uniform.   My child at the age of 4 told me of being spanked for not saying ‘bad things about daddy’.   My daughter was regularly punished at a very early age for not helping her mother with her plots to falsely imprison me.  My daughter withstood secret interviews by at least two judges.  My daughther withstood Lanette’s employees efforts to extract a false allegation from my child in Lanette’s visitation center.  I eventually shut down her center in a Federal Civil Rights action in the Victoria, Texas Federal Court.  And later, as covered below, in another matter, obtained a sanction through the BAR against Lanette Joubert for unethical behavior to her own clients. It seems, as a matter of public record,  Ms. Joubert will burn her own clients as readily as her opponents in false allegations and schemes for profit.  Others have come forward with similar evidence against Ms. Joubert and two of her cronies.

I believe the child, the waiters, and the table ticket that corroborates the event the child describes.   From what my public record experiences are with Galvan and his good friend William Kelly, the opposition attorney, jailing me for paying ahead on child support; placing my child with a man-hating social worker who was used exclusively by the local prosecutor to create allegations against men in un-recorded interviews of children and whose stated goal was to have my daughter tell me that she did not want to continue visitation to improve my child’s confidence, while not addressing my ex continuing to place my child around her convicted molester; and watching as William Kelly forcefully screamed at Judge Galvan with complete impugnity for a good 5 minutes demanding the judge jail me even longer for having paid ahead on child support to his client.   I believe Judge Bobby Galvan to be quite capable of what the child has alleged and the witnesses and evidence indicates.

Below is the body of the grievance with links to some of the more direct evidence provided to the Sunset Review Commission.

 

GRIEVANCE AGAINST THE HONORABLE BOBBY GALVAN, TEXAS DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS

GRIEVANCE AGAINST THE HONORABLE WILLIAM ADAMS, COUNTY COURT AT LAW, ARANSAS COUNTY, TEXAS

GRIEVANCE AGAINST VISITING JUDGE ALCALA

Please find the following background and Judicial Complaint against Judge Bobby Galvan for his alleged collusion in witness tampering and child abuse (enticing a child to falsely accuse an innocent parent). 

Further neither Judge William Adams nor Judge Alcala, who have been presented more evidence than is used to put many men on death row, did not act for the safety of the child. 

Judge William Adams of Youtube child beating infamy and Judge Alcala, should they have not reported to the judicial review authorities, the actions of Judge Galvan as came into their knowledge, both violated judicial ethics rules and colluded with Judge Galvan to create false allegations against innocent parties for self-aggrandizing benefit.

This is a regular pattern and practice in the general Corpus Christi, central Gulf Coast area, determined by a Civil Trial Lawyers group to be the second most judicially corrupt area of the U.S, second only to Dade County, Florida.   Three attorneys seem to be at the heart of most of the more egregious abuses in Family Law in this area, regularly and openly colluding with certain judges in the area.

In the Jennifer Flores-Lamb case we have judges assisting cronies in activity that is not just unethical, but has felony criminal implications in the actions alleged of Judge Bobby Galvan, attorneys Lanette Joubert, William Dudley, and William Kelly.    We have a judge, Aransas County Court at Law Judge William Adams, who is ruling that it is not relevant that the father’s desired ‘New Mother’ for his child who will be caring for the child 5 to 6 days a week for over 12 hours a day is HOMOCIDAL, SUICIDAL, HALLUCINATORY, PART TIME PSYCHOTIC, REGULARLY HOSPITALIZED BY THE STATE AS A THREAT TO HERSELF AND OTHERS AND EXTREMELY HEAVILY MEDICATED WHEN NOT TRYING TO KILL HERSELF OR OTHERS. (author’s recent note for Blog readers: This testimony  begins on page 98 of the transcript at 20101011 Transcript Part 2.)

Followed, in the same hearing, were sanctions against the child’s mother and attorney for addressing this early exposed effort to create false sex abuse allegations.   This is a pattern that is well documented.  The attorney’s alleged at the meeting have done this to innumerable innocent parents over the past twenty years.  At this time there is another case of an attorney who is suing for having been knowingly falsely accused by one of these same attorneys with involvement by these same three attorneys in the Titus Mata case.

In the past 17 years of battling the same three attorneys, who have involved the three judges in this complaint, and other crony judges in an effort to protect my child from her convicted serial child abuser in my ex’s family and in defending myself from strategic false allegations against me by these unethical players, I have spent more time in court than most trial lawyers.   In 2003, alone, I spent 41 days in court when the court was only open a reported 162 days that year.  The allegations against me count into at least a thousand over 17 years.  The costs to my daughter, family, friends, State coffers, etc.    have been horrendous.  All for the edification and minor enrichment of the three attorney’s in the Titus Mata abuse allegations.

I have watched men sentenced to life and to long prison terms on less evidence and no child’s statement than what was presented by Jennifer Flores-Lamb and Mr. David Sibley on this effort to falsely accuse by Judge Galvan, Mr William Dudley, Mr. William Kelly, and Mrs. Lanette Joubert.

Attorneys and the process become extremely abusive and dangerous to the innocent when Judge’s are not held accountable for what they allow in their courts or what they themselves do.

I have been a victim of many of these same efforts to falsely criminalize me.   I am even working on a manuscript to track the common pattern of false allegations.  This corruption is where attorneys work in conjunction with cronies in the judiciary to knowingly assist in false allegations and even to make the allegations themselves.   It is only with a team effort that I and other(s) have survived.   We have several instances of this in my case and others we have observed an in which we have assisted.  

I have had judges ordering me to stop taping exchanges where I was protected by having the recordings of the dates and times of the false violence allegations and even false sexual assault allegations.  

I have had judges state I could be making child porn by taping exchanges of my child where my ex was calling the police on the average of every third time we had to meet to exchange our child.   More time was spent trying to find a time and date where I was not documented than in protecting my child from regular exposure to her molester and other child abusers, as testified by my ex, in her family.

I have had one judge removed from my case and reportedly from any State bench for two years.   Judge Henry Schuble was sanctioned for secret orders in my case while the vast majority of secret orders with secret hearings with no notice were and are completely ignored by the Judicial Review Process.    It was too little, too late.   My daughter was a teenager and three recent psychologists stated she had probably continued to be abused up into her current memory.   Her cousin was convicted of molesting her at her second birthday party.

I have a capias for my arrest that has been in my file for the last 10 years from a secret contempt hearing with no notice on file.   The capias has not been processed.  It was for not paying an ad litem, Jeanette Cantu-Bazar’s bill for what she had testified were false reports of sexual assault of my child that Jeanette had fabricated, along with claims to have interviewed witnesses with whom she had never actually talked.  Jeanette was the sister-in-law of William Kelly, my ex’s attorney. 

I have had Judge Rose Vela sign a fraudulent felony conviction order where no notice of hearing had been given, no hearing held, and no evidence given before her.  Yet, I have no felony on my record at this time.  The order is still sitting in my file, #97-2091 in the Nueces County Courthouse.   I complained to the judicial review commission and there was nothing done.

These are only two examples of the abuses committed by judges colluding with a particular group of three attorneys in the Corpus area.   I was being punished for not abandoning my child to my ex and her pedophile family members.   My ex testified that the molestation of our daughter at the age of two was both “humorous” and “appropriate” in the day before our divorce was final.  My ex had moved in with the family member convicted of serial pedophilia before the divorce was over.   I was given visitation over 50% of my child’s time, “To protect your child”, but my ex was given custody so I had no authority. 

This would not be done with accountability methods in place.

This family relationship was only recently discovered (between William Kelly and Jeanette Cantu-Bazar).   Jeanette made the false allegations against me while she was a Corpus Christi Municipal Court Judge, appointed through the efforts of city councilman William Kelly.   The judicial review system and the Bar both ignored the perjuries and frauds of Jeanette and the many other judges and same three attorneys, Kelly, Joubert, and Dudley,  that were documented through her own court room testimony and admissions.

On another occasion, I had a psychologist who was a friend and drinking buddy of Judge Henry Schuble, state he believed an allegation against me of sexual abuse of a child.  However, that psychologist stated to me and my attorney that he only did it for political reasons.  He wanted more business from the judge and William Kelly.   We got him to admit to this under oath.

I had Lanette Joubert sanctioned by the Bar for some of her egregious acts against me in relation to this false allegation and others.  Mrs. Joubert routinely represents first one party then the other and making false allegations against the first party she represented.  The Bar document notifying me of this is attached and labeled “Bar Notice….” .   The sanction was a $600 assessment for the Bar’s attorney and a requirement to take an ethics class.   Ms. Joubert was rewarded for her abuses by not having any real or lasting sanction to send others a message.   I have since witnessed Ms. Joubert use the exact same unethical behavior in another case and have obtained the transcript of her open court admissions of conflict of interest against a prior paying client, who was objecting.  Ms. Joubert was allowed to continue in her gross conflict of interest by this additional judge.

I have documented 8 others whose complaints for the exact same acts fell on deaf ears with the Bar and the local judges allow her to abuse litigants with impunity.   She destroys families.   This is done in collusion with various judges in the area who laughingly allow extreme abuses of the process and system.  If there were accountability for the judge’s, most of these victims may actually have a running chance.

William Dudley admitted to me, David Sibley, Dr. Beckham, and others that he was knowingly abusing my child and admitted this before Judge Henry Schuble who laughed and was entertained by this as Judge Henry Schuble

Included in the attached DVD is a campaign brochure,  with an attorney’s affidavit testifying to William Kelly’s efforts to remove me from my child’s life and hand my child over completely to my ex and her family members who had already been convicted of molesting my child and other children and alleged to have molested even my ex and her sister as children.   The brochure was in Mr. Kelly’s first election run for Corpus Christi City council.  

Mr. Kelly had Judge Henry Schuble order me gagged and to destroy my brochures.   I had to destroy 3,000 of them.  Kelly won by only 800 votes, the smallest margin in nearly two decades for council seat in Corpus.  The gag order on me is covered in a text book, “Taken Into Custody”  that was on best seller lists for nearly two years, written by a political science professor, Dr. Stephen Baskerville.  This is the same Mr. Kelly allegedly at the restaurant with Titus.

I understand the process and these particularly criminal attorneys and judges.

Titus Mata, a child, and Jennifer Flores-Lamb, the mother:

I wish to report through the Sunset Commission, evidence and testimony alleging a Texas District Judge  was actively participating in an effort to intimidate a child into making a false allegation against his mother and her attorney.   The judge was stated to have been acting in collusion with an attorney that all in the area acknowledge the judge provides preferential rulings and almost exclusive appointments of financially lucrative assignments.  The attorney is William Kelly, the stated close friend of Judge Galvan. 

I and others have witnessed Kelly screaming at Judge Galvan for several minutes in open court with complete impunity.    I believe the actions in the Titus Mata case are the common patterns and practices of the attorneys and Judges involved.

Mr. Kelly has been involved in the sanctioning of one judge, Henry Schuble and public embarrassment of other judges, yet, continues to insinuate himself into the graces of other judges, such as Galvan, to embarrass and endanger his career.

Ms. Flores-Lamb, Jennifer, has been punished and fined for stopping a false allegation from developing against her.  The false allegation process was discovered early.   Jennifer and her attorney made every effort to expose this criminal activity.  They were fined for their efforts but did not face the severe criminal charges for which they were being set-up.

I have watched and assisted in the defense of Ms. Flores-Lamb as the same three attorney’s, Kelly, Joubert, and Dudley, working with colluding judges have begun the process of criminalizing not just Ms. Florez-Lamb, but also, her attorney David Sibley.   I have lived through 14 known efforts to accuse me of child sexual assault.   I have survived thousands of false allegations of DV, stalking, harassment, etc.  by video and audio recording all interactions with my ex-wife and mother of my child.  She once testified to making 50 false allegations against me in one two week period of time to at least three different law enforcement agencies and the Texas CPS.   The judges were entertained, yet refused to protect my child from her convicted molester or me from the false allegations used to attempt to keep me from discovering the abuses and endangerments of my child.

A child’s testimony, just as in many sex offenses against children, was what exposed an alleged plot by several attorney’s, a sitting Texas District Judge, and the child’s father.   The plot was to have the child state that the child had been sexually touched by the mother and had been made to watch the child’s mother and attorney in bed.

On Saturday, September 18, 2010, Titus Mata was taken to his favorite restaurant, near his father’s home.  They went there to have lunch with a number of individuals.  The child, in his own words in the videos,  clearly states who was present.   In the video labeled “Titus on Seating Arrangement”, (at the mother’s request the videos showing her son are only available to the authorities concerned) the child, Titus Mata, son of Andrew Mata and Jennifer Flores-Lamb, explains who sat in what location at the table where Titus states Judge Bobby Galvan, Lanette Joubert, William Dudley, and William Kelly sat.   This video was taken Thursday, September 26, 2010.

Two waiters attended that particular table on the date and time Titus stated he and his father met with Judge Galvan, Lanette Joubert, William Kelly, William Dudley, and Titus’ Uncle, a Corpus Christi Police sergeant named ‘Junior’.   Both waiters recognized Titus.  One was out of town at the time of the October 11, 2010 hearing where this matter was first raised before the court.  The other testified at that hearing and his testimony is attached in the transcript provided titled 20101011_Transcript_Part_2(1).  This second waiter corroborated the child’s statement as to seating arrangements of the child and the other people at the table.   The waiter corroborated the correct number of people at that table.  The testifying waiter testified to recognizing the child and father as regulars at that restaurant.

The owner of the restaurant, Mandarin Gardens, in Corpus Christi, provided a copy of the table ticket for the exact date and time Titus stated the meeting was held where efforts were made to get him to make a false allegation against his mother and her attorney.  This ticket, which was admitted into evidence in the October 10, 2010 hearing is included in the DVD, and is titled Restaurant_Ticket[1]Mr. David Sibley, one of the targets of the alleged effort to create false allegations against Jennifer and himself, upon hearing of the child’s allegations against these adults recommended the employment of a forensic pediatric psychologist, Dr. Barbara Beckham.  Dr. Beckham interviewed Titus.  This interview is on the video labeled “Beckham_Interview”  provided in the CD with this report. 

Dr. Beckham testified in the October 11, 2010 hearing as to the determined truthfulness of Titus in his statements.   Dr. Beckham’s testimony can be found in (1) on pages 108  through page 121

Judge William Adams of the Youtube child beating infamy, was the judge sitting in this hearing.   He had sanctioned Mr. Sibley for subpoenaing records from attorney William Dudley and ordered Mr. Sibley to pay Mr. Dudley a considerable sum.   It was not disclosed at that time that Judge Adams had employed Mr. Dudley for the judge’s own custody case of a daughter who was younger than the M.S. afflicted child he was recorded beating.

Here are the judge’s own words, taken from  20101011_Transcript_Part_2(1)

“I find that the allegations in your motion,

most of them, Mr. Sibley, are baseless and groundless.

And I’m just rereading the supplemental motion that you

filed. And I didn’t hardly hear any evidence of

anything that you alleged in the motion. About the only

thing I did hear was the waiter from the restaurant

could identify the child, the child’s father at the

restaurant on that particular day. But he could not say

whether or not these other lawyers and a judge were

there. And I don’t have any evidence, whatsoever, that

they were there. And those are really, really strong

allegations for you to make without being able to back

them up.

I’m not going to grant your motion.

And I’m very tempted to go ahead and change the custody over

on a temporary basis. However, I’m going to keep the

status quo right now.”

Following the above hearing, after a series of legal efforts, Mr. Sibley managed to get Titus to be allowed to testify before Judge Alcala.   This public record, unsealed video, is included in the DVD under the title “Titus_Interview_with_Judge_Alcala_Present”.

 The testimony of the mother on the child’s utterances have sent many a man to prison for life, but if the alleged abuser is a judge, then the mother is fined and her child taken, where there is more than enough evidence to convict or to at least start a more serious criminal investigation by law enforcement.

 I have testified in the Titus Mata case as to pattern and practice and in impeachment of one of the witness/attorneys in this affair.   I can provide impeachment documentation and transcripts on all parties, including Judge Galvan.

I wish to file this as a grievance and as a witness statement.  I state that the information contained herein is as true and accurate as I am able to determine.

Thank you for allowing me to participate in this very important and very serious deliberation.

 Sincerely,

 Stanley A. Rains, Jr.

Texas Rangers -Just One More Criminal Complaint against Judge Adams


In this blog is a copy of a criminal complaint from August 2011 against Judge Adams.  As I have stated, repeatedly,   Judge Adams was not abusive in a vacuum and  he does not act alone.   He can only abuse with the tacit approval of other judges and various law enforcement agencies.   Any of them could have at least slowed the judge down on his path of destruction through a county in South Texas without removing him from the bench.  But none would hold him accountable.  

It has been said that two judges from two surrounding counties once visited Judge Adams asking him to lay off of the abuse he heaped on a quadraplegic prosecutor in Aransas County.   Judge Adams ignored the two Texas District Judges.   Why does that not surprise anyone?

Following this paragraph is a copy of the complaint made to the Texas Rangers by David Sibley against Judge William Adams.   The complaint was made three months ago.   I have replaced the names of the two witnesses quoted in the complaint to X and Y to protect them from retaliation by the Judge and his cronies.  The complaint is about Judge Adams alleged efforts in an open courtroom, before numerous witnesses, to have an Aransas County Prosecuter ‘CREATE’ allegations against Mr. David Sibley. 

Mr. Sibley, an attorney at law, has been attempting to draw attention to the judicial abuses committed by Judge Adams as he favors friends and ignores law.  

There is great harm to innocent individuals and in the general public’s trust in our courts when a judge gone bad acts in an openly criminal and extremely arrogant manner in his courtroom.   

****************************************************************************************************************

David A. Sibley

Attorney At Law

08/11/11

Via rangers@dps.texas.gov  Texas Rangers

Re: Judge William Adams

County Court at Law Judge, Aransas County, Texas;.

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

This is a criminal complaint against Judge William Adams, County Court at Law, Aransas County, Texas. I have known about this crime for some time. However, I did not eye witness it, and I didn’t know whether the eye witness would be willing to talk in public.

The eye witness is an attorney who practices in Judge Adams’ Court. The eye witness obviously subjects himself to retaliation by giving his testimony. Judge Adams has a history of retaliation and dishonesty. He uses various state agencies to assist him in retaliation.

However, I ran across the witness at a restaurant last night. He was upset at Judge Adams because Judge Adams had been rude to him. Apparently, Judge Adams was impatient at getting a plea done. This witness was trying to explain the 4 sets of plea papers to his client who he had represented for only 1 day (it is of course the job of a lawyer to make sure the client understands plea papers). Judge Adams was impatient and rude among other things saying things like “just sign the papers.” Judge Adams is disrespectful of litigants.

I hate to get somebody involved because I know Judge Adams will retaliate, but I simply asked X if he would speak out about what he told me months ago. He said yes. He is a very stand up guy. His name is X. He is a lawyer with his office in Portland.

The background is last October Judge Adams was very abusive towards my client and myself. His actions went beyond a bad day or poor performance. His conduct amounted to abuse of my client, a child, and myself. He was retaliatory and dishonest. I complained about his behavior in a number of ways including the judicial conduct commission.

X knew nothing about those events and really still doesn’t. He knows very little still. I first learned about what X witnessed from a friend named Y. As I recall, X and Y somewhere were talking. X knows that Y  is my friend. X told Y that Judge Adams is trying to have David Sibley arrested and that David Sibley should be careful. Y told me this.

A short later I ran across X at the Butter Churn in Aransas Pass. I asked him about what Walter had said. X told me that Judge Adams was sitting on the bench in open court telling the County Attorney (or assistant county attorney) to charge me with a crime (I think disorderly conduct). Judge Adams was claiming to be scared of me or something. You will have to talk to X and the County Attorney (or assistant) to get the details. The fact is that I have done nothing to Judge Adams other than complain about  his corrupt and dishonest behavior in writing (which is not a crime).

Since these controversies have started, I have only seen Judge Adams once and that was in the hallway of the public courthouse with lots of people around. I wouldn’t be around him without witnesses because I know him to be dishonest and retaliatory. I also know him to have a family law mentality (which routinely involves false accusations and feigned “fear”). I know he made an accusation of violence or threat against another lawyer some years ago (Jeff Dietz). I don’t know whether that was true or false but I see a potential pattern here.

The fact is that there was no basis whatsoever for Judge Adams attempting to start a criminal charge against me. He was retaliating and he was filing a false report (both crimes). The County Attorney is law enforcement. He was making a false report to her (I believe it was a “her”). He was retaliating against me because I complained about his judicial behavior. His behavior amounts to things like 1) filing a false report, 2) official oppression, and 3) retaliation. You’ll need to get the details from X and the County Attorney (or assistant). I believe X, and I also know this is consistent with other things Judge Adams has done. He has been retaliating because I have complained about his judicial behavior. He retaliated against my client because my client reported crimes committed by some lawyers who are obviously his friends (these lawyers were trying to get a child to lie about his mother that his mother “touched” him among other devious lies). Thanks.

Respectfully,

/s David A. Sibley

Judge Adams – Homicidal, Hullucinating, Psychotic Babysitter Is OK.


Here is a link to a section of a transcript where Judge Adams, after reviewing a homicidal, hullucinating, psychotic babysitter’s medical records in chambers with both attorney’s was keeping the medical records out.   The father had repeatedly stated he was going to continue to have this babysitter watch his son up to 12 hours a day at least 6 days a week, no matter what the medical records showed.       (click on blue link to see the transcript) ->.    Judge Adams helps put a child in danger.

I have read and been present when the medical records of the homicidal babysitter were reviewed by the child’s psychologist.   The psychologist was very distressed that the judge had intentionally kept out records of a known life-threatening danger to a child.   In the transcript where it states “The Court:    I hope the child doesn’t get hurt.    No further questions.”   Was actually Mr. Sibley’s statement.   And at this point a certain small exchange was excluded by the court reporter.

Just before the quote above in this paragraph.   Mr. Sibley asked, “Your honor, you mean that the babysitter for this child being homicidal is not relevent?”.   In response, Judge Adams simply said, “Yep”.    I was there.    The court room was full.    Many others were there.   All were shocked.

State law and Judicial Canons required Judge Adams to protect the child from any hazard coming to his knowledge.  Judge Adams violated law, in this laymen’s opinion, when he refused to protect the child.   It, also, seems this typical Texas Family Law Judge became a party to criminal endangerment of this little 7 year old child.   Again, just my opinion, after 20 years of intense involvement in parents’ rights advocacy in Texas.

Court Reporters are the judge’s political appointees in Texas and most States in the U.s. Court reporters do not type the full and accurate transcription of what happens when court is in session.   I discovered that truth personally

Through a licensing board, I managed to get a court reporter sanctioned, Yvette Shurgart, of Victoria Texas by the Texas Court Reporter’s Certification Board.   I managed to get her sanctioned for embezzling money from me and destroying a transcript of my ex-wife testifying that her mother had prostituted my ex’s older sister on the streets of Corpus Christi when that sibling was as young as 9 to 11 years of age.   It was during the process of following through on my grievances, when I discovered in Texas, Court Reporters make very large incomes each year selling transcripts for rates of $1.50 to $7.50 U.S per page made with county supplies, while on county salaries, to litigants for appeal or documentation purposes, as personal income.

The transcript portion which is provided in the link above, left out considerable, but included enough to show Mr. Sibley and his client making every effort to protect a 7 year old child.

In the year since the transcripted hearing, the father was given custody of the child, the child has spent the majority of his awake hours, when not at school with  the homicidal, hallucinating, sometimes psychotic babysitter.   A neighbor of the homicidal babysitter video taped, as discussed in another blog entry, the boy on a busy, narrow commercial road riding his bicycle, unsupervised.

The part-time psychotic babysitter has stated she drives under the influence of extremely strong medications ranging from anti-psychotics and anti-depressants to anti-anxiety pills, since she is supposed to be taking her medications several times a day.   All of these various psychotropic drugs preclude her from driving legally.    I read the medical history and current list of medications while a psychologist explained what each  diagnosis and medication was and how they limited the capacity of anyone to care for young children or to drive.   Judge Adams was told of this in chambers with attorney’s for both parents present.   That conference was only minutes prior to the transcript provided above.   Judge Adams stated he did not want to see the records and he saw no relevence in presenting them in the custody case before him.    The little boy’s mother and her attorney tried to protect the child without the need for publicity on the extreme mental illness and open danger to the child left alone with his homicidal, hallucinatory, and drugged up Aunt.   The little boy’s Aunt had a medical record that read very similarly to what is known of Judge Adams mother, according to Hallie Adams, Judge Adams own wife.

In the case of the homicidal, part-time psychotic babysitter Judge Adams has forced the little boy’s mother and her attorney to put the Aunt’s medical history into the open public record in an effort to protect the child.   As of November 28, 2011, the little boy has been in the care of the homicidal, drugged. time-bomb of a baby sitter for 13 months.

Judge Adams went a step beyond the absurd in this case.   Judge Adams sanctioned the attorney and the mother for trying to protect a child the judge knew the judge was putting into danger.   The judge was giving this child up to a be with a homicidal, suicidal, part-time psychotic, and hallucinating babysitter who had been repeatedly hospitalized in the recent past for the safety of the general public.

This homicidal babysitter, drugged to the gills by the State of Texas for the safety of the public, drives the boy to and from school.  The boy’s school is a major portion of the distance across Corpus Christi.  Good Ole’ drugged up, homicidal, suicidal, hallucinating, sometimes psychotic babysitter ( a member of the father’s family) is driving the streets of Corpus twice a day during the school year with an innocent 7 year old in the car with her.

Judge Adams not only approved, but actively worked at doing this as a favor to the attorney , Lynette Joubert, a long time cohort and co-conspirator of William Dudley, good friend and attorney for Judge William Adams.

William Dudley is the attorney who wrote and sent out the press release for Judge Adams blaming the daughter for the beating she was given.   In a previous case, William Dudley has been documented loudly mocking Christianity in open court, turning chairs upside down on table while an opposition attorney was attempting to present evidence to a judge, and admitted to abusing a child to multiples of individuals including a senior pediatric forensic psychologist.  After the psychologist in that case repeatedly asked William Dudley if he understood what he was saying when he said “I helped abuse this child.” , the psychologist, Dr. Barbara Beckham, filed a grievance with the Texas Bar Association for ethics violations.   When the grievance was heard by the local Corpus Christi, Texas Bar grievance committee, Mr. Dudley walked into the administrative hearing and in the first 10 seconds announced that Dr. Beckham had recanted her complaint.   Dr. Beckham’s attorney was present in the hearing and immediately asked to call Dr. Beckham from the adjacent waiting room.   Dr. Beckham, within 60 seconds of the hearing being called stated clearly that she had definitely not recanted.    William Dudley, Judge Adams current attorney, probably set a new record for proving an ethics  violation against himself  within 60 seconds of the hearing being called.

The Texas Bar Representative present at that local Bar hearing was Mr. James Ehler.   The local Bar issued a ruling several days later that they found William Dudley had committed no violation of the Texas Bar Ethics rules for attorneys.    Dr. Beckham’s attorney, David Sibley, Esq.,  filed a grievance against the local Bar grievance committee, including Mr. James Ehler.   Mr. Ehler, in his governmental capacity has had a very apparent open vendetta against Mr. Sibley from the time of the filing against the grievance committee for ignoring the violation of ethics committed by Mr. William Dudley, during a hearing against Mr. Dudley.  The grievance committee also ignored the open boasting, admissions that William Dudley had been knowingly helping to abuse a child.   Mr. Dudley had made those admissions in front of four witnesses.  All of whom were present and willing to testify to the Bar grievance committee.   Only Dr. Beckham was called and she was ignored.

In the case of the homicidal babysitter, the father who got custody and turned his child over to the homicidal and hullucinating babysitter,  testified the mother was a good mother and other than documented effort by the father to make false sex abuse allegations against the mother, there were no criticisms of the mom.  (This is another well documented story about a second judge and William Dudley abusing another child)   But, Judge Adams, who could have ordered, at the very least, the child not be left with the this homicidal babysitter, did not even do that.   The judge must have believed that since he survived being raised by his mother, this little five year old boy could survive being raised by his hallucinating and part time psychotic Aunt.

Judge Adams, as a favor to his attorney friends, Lynette Joubert, William Dudley, and William Kelly, gave a 7 year old over to a part-time psyschotic, full-time homicidal and drugged up babysitter.  All three had been party to the efforts to have the second judge intimidate a 5 year old boy into saying his mother touched him ‘bad’ and that he had been made to watch his mother and her attorney in bed.   The mother and attorney had no romantic relationship.  This was an attempt to create a false outcry by a child accusing the innocent mother and attorney of child sex abuse.

The second portion of the transcript exerpt gives a bit more information on these attorneys and another Judge in nearby Nueces County attempting to persuade and intimidate the 7 year old boy to falsely claim his mother touched him sexually and that the boy had been  made to watch the mother and her attorney have sex in bed together.  There is much more to this sordid story.   It is generally typical of what is done to fathers in Texas family courts, not mothers

This is how the State of Texas handles the “Best Interest of the Child” standard which the legislature has refused to define in any manner except to leave it open for the judges in Texas to enrich themselves and their good friends.

This author is talking to the mother and her attorney in an effort to be able to post the video of the little boy on the busy highway in front of the homicidal babysitter’s house, unsupervised.  The father’s babysitter for the child is nowhere in sight and often passed out on the couch while the boy wanders the street and neighborhood.  Remember, not even the father who now has custody has ever stated the mother did anything wrong in the care of the child.

These medical records of the babysitter were duly subpoenaed and delivered over and received in full compliance of both Federal and State Health Information Privacy statutes and rules.  These records have been filed with the Aransas County District Clerk.  They are a matter of public record and  in files available to the general public.

Unsealed divorce records are public accessible, except where the Aransas County District Clerk lies to the person requesting access to public files.  This has been done to help Judge Adams take money form Mr. Sibley in sanctions that would not have succeeded had Mr. Sibley had full knowledge of the public record.  Judge Adams has hidden from David Sibley and the mother in this case, the judge’s close personal and business ties to Lynette Joubert and William Dudley.  These are serious conflicts of interest.

This is an interesting and sinister story for another time of how the Aransas County District Clerk helped to hide the public record files of Judge Adams divorce from para-legals and from attorney David Sibley, the attorney for the mother of the child in the transcripted case referenced above.

It seems Mr. Sibley was unaware of the ongoing attorney-client relationship between Adams and Dudley when Adams sanctioned Sibley for attempting to subpoena a copy of a family law text written by Dudley and William Kelly.  The Aransas County District Clerk seems to have conspired with Judge Adams and William Dudley to enrich themselves with fines assessed against Mr. Sibley while denying him the public record to defend himself.   Neither Judge Adams nor Dudley revealed their personal and business relationships to Mr. Sibley or to the child’s mother.

Is this how Judge Adams pays his attorney, with the fines assessed to others?