Texas Rangers -Just One More Criminal Complaint against Judge Adams


In this blog is a copy of a criminal complaint from August 2011 against Judge Adams.  As I have stated, repeatedly,   Judge Adams was not abusive in a vacuum and  he does not act alone.   He can only abuse with the tacit approval of other judges and various law enforcement agencies.   Any of them could have at least slowed the judge down on his path of destruction through a county in South Texas without removing him from the bench.  But none would hold him accountable.  

It has been said that two judges from two surrounding counties once visited Judge Adams asking him to lay off of the abuse he heaped on a quadraplegic prosecutor in Aransas County.   Judge Adams ignored the two Texas District Judges.   Why does that not surprise anyone?

Following this paragraph is a copy of the complaint made to the Texas Rangers by David Sibley against Judge William Adams.   The complaint was made three months ago.   I have replaced the names of the two witnesses quoted in the complaint to X and Y to protect them from retaliation by the Judge and his cronies.  The complaint is about Judge Adams alleged efforts in an open courtroom, before numerous witnesses, to have an Aransas County Prosecuter ‘CREATE’ allegations against Mr. David Sibley. 

Mr. Sibley, an attorney at law, has been attempting to draw attention to the judicial abuses committed by Judge Adams as he favors friends and ignores law.  

There is great harm to innocent individuals and in the general public’s trust in our courts when a judge gone bad acts in an openly criminal and extremely arrogant manner in his courtroom.   

****************************************************************************************************************

David A. Sibley

Attorney At Law

08/11/11

Via rangers@dps.texas.gov  Texas Rangers

Re: Judge William Adams

County Court at Law Judge, Aransas County, Texas;.

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

This is a criminal complaint against Judge William Adams, County Court at Law, Aransas County, Texas. I have known about this crime for some time. However, I did not eye witness it, and I didn’t know whether the eye witness would be willing to talk in public.

The eye witness is an attorney who practices in Judge Adams’ Court. The eye witness obviously subjects himself to retaliation by giving his testimony. Judge Adams has a history of retaliation and dishonesty. He uses various state agencies to assist him in retaliation.

However, I ran across the witness at a restaurant last night. He was upset at Judge Adams because Judge Adams had been rude to him. Apparently, Judge Adams was impatient at getting a plea done. This witness was trying to explain the 4 sets of plea papers to his client who he had represented for only 1 day (it is of course the job of a lawyer to make sure the client understands plea papers). Judge Adams was impatient and rude among other things saying things like “just sign the papers.” Judge Adams is disrespectful of litigants.

I hate to get somebody involved because I know Judge Adams will retaliate, but I simply asked X if he would speak out about what he told me months ago. He said yes. He is a very stand up guy. His name is X. He is a lawyer with his office in Portland.

The background is last October Judge Adams was very abusive towards my client and myself. His actions went beyond a bad day or poor performance. His conduct amounted to abuse of my client, a child, and myself. He was retaliatory and dishonest. I complained about his behavior in a number of ways including the judicial conduct commission.

X knew nothing about those events and really still doesn’t. He knows very little still. I first learned about what X witnessed from a friend named Y. As I recall, X and Y somewhere were talking. X knows that Y  is my friend. X told Y that Judge Adams is trying to have David Sibley arrested and that David Sibley should be careful. Y told me this.

A short later I ran across X at the Butter Churn in Aransas Pass. I asked him about what Walter had said. X told me that Judge Adams was sitting on the bench in open court telling the County Attorney (or assistant county attorney) to charge me with a crime (I think disorderly conduct). Judge Adams was claiming to be scared of me or something. You will have to talk to X and the County Attorney (or assistant) to get the details. The fact is that I have done nothing to Judge Adams other than complain about  his corrupt and dishonest behavior in writing (which is not a crime).

Since these controversies have started, I have only seen Judge Adams once and that was in the hallway of the public courthouse with lots of people around. I wouldn’t be around him without witnesses because I know him to be dishonest and retaliatory. I also know him to have a family law mentality (which routinely involves false accusations and feigned “fear”). I know he made an accusation of violence or threat against another lawyer some years ago (Jeff Dietz). I don’t know whether that was true or false but I see a potential pattern here.

The fact is that there was no basis whatsoever for Judge Adams attempting to start a criminal charge against me. He was retaliating and he was filing a false report (both crimes). The County Attorney is law enforcement. He was making a false report to her (I believe it was a “her”). He was retaliating against me because I complained about his judicial behavior. His behavior amounts to things like 1) filing a false report, 2) official oppression, and 3) retaliation. You’ll need to get the details from X and the County Attorney (or assistant). I believe X, and I also know this is consistent with other things Judge Adams has done. He has been retaliating because I have complained about his judicial behavior. He retaliated against my client because my client reported crimes committed by some lawyers who are obviously his friends (these lawyers were trying to get a child to lie about his mother that his mother “touched” him among other devious lies). Thanks.

Respectfully,

/s David A. Sibley

Judge Adams – Homicidal, Hullucinating, Psychotic Babysitter Is OK.


Here is a link to a section of a transcript where Judge Adams, after reviewing a homicidal, hullucinating, psychotic babysitter’s medical records in chambers with both attorney’s was keeping the medical records out.   The father had repeatedly stated he was going to continue to have this babysitter watch his son up to 12 hours a day at least 6 days a week, no matter what the medical records showed.       (click on blue link to see the transcript) ->.    Judge Adams helps put a child in danger.

I have read and been present when the medical records of the homicidal babysitter were reviewed by the child’s psychologist.   The psychologist was very distressed that the judge had intentionally kept out records of a known life-threatening danger to a child.   In the transcript where it states “The Court:    I hope the child doesn’t get hurt.    No further questions.”   Was actually Mr. Sibley’s statement.   And at this point a certain small exchange was excluded by the court reporter.

Just before the quote above in this paragraph.   Mr. Sibley asked, “Your honor, you mean that the babysitter for this child being homicidal is not relevent?”.   In response, Judge Adams simply said, “Yep”.    I was there.    The court room was full.    Many others were there.   All were shocked.

State law and Judicial Canons required Judge Adams to protect the child from any hazard coming to his knowledge.  Judge Adams violated law, in this laymen’s opinion, when he refused to protect the child.   It, also, seems this typical Texas Family Law Judge became a party to criminal endangerment of this little 7 year old child.   Again, just my opinion, after 20 years of intense involvement in parents’ rights advocacy in Texas.

Court Reporters are the judge’s political appointees in Texas and most States in the U.s. Court reporters do not type the full and accurate transcription of what happens when court is in session.   I discovered that truth personally

Through a licensing board, I managed to get a court reporter sanctioned, Yvette Shurgart, of Victoria Texas by the Texas Court Reporter’s Certification Board.   I managed to get her sanctioned for embezzling money from me and destroying a transcript of my ex-wife testifying that her mother had prostituted my ex’s older sister on the streets of Corpus Christi when that sibling was as young as 9 to 11 years of age.   It was during the process of following through on my grievances, when I discovered in Texas, Court Reporters make very large incomes each year selling transcripts for rates of $1.50 to $7.50 U.S per page made with county supplies, while on county salaries, to litigants for appeal or documentation purposes, as personal income.

The transcript portion which is provided in the link above, left out considerable, but included enough to show Mr. Sibley and his client making every effort to protect a 7 year old child.

In the year since the transcripted hearing, the father was given custody of the child, the child has spent the majority of his awake hours, when not at school with  the homicidal, hallucinating, sometimes psychotic babysitter.   A neighbor of the homicidal babysitter video taped, as discussed in another blog entry, the boy on a busy, narrow commercial road riding his bicycle, unsupervised.

The part-time psychotic babysitter has stated she drives under the influence of extremely strong medications ranging from anti-psychotics and anti-depressants to anti-anxiety pills, since she is supposed to be taking her medications several times a day.   All of these various psychotropic drugs preclude her from driving legally.    I read the medical history and current list of medications while a psychologist explained what each  diagnosis and medication was and how they limited the capacity of anyone to care for young children or to drive.   Judge Adams was told of this in chambers with attorney’s for both parents present.   That conference was only minutes prior to the transcript provided above.   Judge Adams stated he did not want to see the records and he saw no relevence in presenting them in the custody case before him.    The little boy’s mother and her attorney tried to protect the child without the need for publicity on the extreme mental illness and open danger to the child left alone with his homicidal, hallucinatory, and drugged up Aunt.   The little boy’s Aunt had a medical record that read very similarly to what is known of Judge Adams mother, according to Hallie Adams, Judge Adams own wife.

In the case of the homicidal, part-time psychotic babysitter Judge Adams has forced the little boy’s mother and her attorney to put the Aunt’s medical history into the open public record in an effort to protect the child.   As of November 28, 2011, the little boy has been in the care of the homicidal, drugged. time-bomb of a baby sitter for 13 months.

Judge Adams went a step beyond the absurd in this case.   Judge Adams sanctioned the attorney and the mother for trying to protect a child the judge knew the judge was putting into danger.   The judge was giving this child up to a be with a homicidal, suicidal, part-time psychotic, and hallucinating babysitter who had been repeatedly hospitalized in the recent past for the safety of the general public.

This homicidal babysitter, drugged to the gills by the State of Texas for the safety of the public, drives the boy to and from school.  The boy’s school is a major portion of the distance across Corpus Christi.  Good Ole’ drugged up, homicidal, suicidal, hallucinating, sometimes psychotic babysitter ( a member of the father’s family) is driving the streets of Corpus twice a day during the school year with an innocent 7 year old in the car with her.

Judge Adams not only approved, but actively worked at doing this as a favor to the attorney , Lynette Joubert, a long time cohort and co-conspirator of William Dudley, good friend and attorney for Judge William Adams.

William Dudley is the attorney who wrote and sent out the press release for Judge Adams blaming the daughter for the beating she was given.   In a previous case, William Dudley has been documented loudly mocking Christianity in open court, turning chairs upside down on table while an opposition attorney was attempting to present evidence to a judge, and admitted to abusing a child to multiples of individuals including a senior pediatric forensic psychologist.  After the psychologist in that case repeatedly asked William Dudley if he understood what he was saying when he said “I helped abuse this child.” , the psychologist, Dr. Barbara Beckham, filed a grievance with the Texas Bar Association for ethics violations.   When the grievance was heard by the local Corpus Christi, Texas Bar grievance committee, Mr. Dudley walked into the administrative hearing and in the first 10 seconds announced that Dr. Beckham had recanted her complaint.   Dr. Beckham’s attorney was present in the hearing and immediately asked to call Dr. Beckham from the adjacent waiting room.   Dr. Beckham, within 60 seconds of the hearing being called stated clearly that she had definitely not recanted.    William Dudley, Judge Adams current attorney, probably set a new record for proving an ethics  violation against himself  within 60 seconds of the hearing being called.

The Texas Bar Representative present at that local Bar hearing was Mr. James Ehler.   The local Bar issued a ruling several days later that they found William Dudley had committed no violation of the Texas Bar Ethics rules for attorneys.    Dr. Beckham’s attorney, David Sibley, Esq.,  filed a grievance against the local Bar grievance committee, including Mr. James Ehler.   Mr. Ehler, in his governmental capacity has had a very apparent open vendetta against Mr. Sibley from the time of the filing against the grievance committee for ignoring the violation of ethics committed by Mr. William Dudley, during a hearing against Mr. Dudley.  The grievance committee also ignored the open boasting, admissions that William Dudley had been knowingly helping to abuse a child.   Mr. Dudley had made those admissions in front of four witnesses.  All of whom were present and willing to testify to the Bar grievance committee.   Only Dr. Beckham was called and she was ignored.

In the case of the homicidal babysitter, the father who got custody and turned his child over to the homicidal and hullucinating babysitter,  testified the mother was a good mother and other than documented effort by the father to make false sex abuse allegations against the mother, there were no criticisms of the mom.  (This is another well documented story about a second judge and William Dudley abusing another child)   But, Judge Adams, who could have ordered, at the very least, the child not be left with the this homicidal babysitter, did not even do that.   The judge must have believed that since he survived being raised by his mother, this little five year old boy could survive being raised by his hallucinating and part time psychotic Aunt.

Judge Adams, as a favor to his attorney friends, Lynette Joubert, William Dudley, and William Kelly, gave a 7 year old over to a part-time psyschotic, full-time homicidal and drugged up babysitter.  All three had been party to the efforts to have the second judge intimidate a 5 year old boy into saying his mother touched him ‘bad’ and that he had been made to watch his mother and her attorney in bed.   The mother and attorney had no romantic relationship.  This was an attempt to create a false outcry by a child accusing the innocent mother and attorney of child sex abuse.

The second portion of the transcript exerpt gives a bit more information on these attorneys and another Judge in nearby Nueces County attempting to persuade and intimidate the 7 year old boy to falsely claim his mother touched him sexually and that the boy had been  made to watch the mother and her attorney have sex in bed together.  There is much more to this sordid story.   It is generally typical of what is done to fathers in Texas family courts, not mothers

This is how the State of Texas handles the “Best Interest of the Child” standard which the legislature has refused to define in any manner except to leave it open for the judges in Texas to enrich themselves and their good friends.

This author is talking to the mother and her attorney in an effort to be able to post the video of the little boy on the busy highway in front of the homicidal babysitter’s house, unsupervised.  The father’s babysitter for the child is nowhere in sight and often passed out on the couch while the boy wanders the street and neighborhood.  Remember, not even the father who now has custody has ever stated the mother did anything wrong in the care of the child.

These medical records of the babysitter were duly subpoenaed and delivered over and received in full compliance of both Federal and State Health Information Privacy statutes and rules.  These records have been filed with the Aransas County District Clerk.  They are a matter of public record and  in files available to the general public.

Unsealed divorce records are public accessible, except where the Aransas County District Clerk lies to the person requesting access to public files.  This has been done to help Judge Adams take money form Mr. Sibley in sanctions that would not have succeeded had Mr. Sibley had full knowledge of the public record.  Judge Adams has hidden from David Sibley and the mother in this case, the judge’s close personal and business ties to Lynette Joubert and William Dudley.  These are serious conflicts of interest.

This is an interesting and sinister story for another time of how the Aransas County District Clerk helped to hide the public record files of Judge Adams divorce from para-legals and from attorney David Sibley, the attorney for the mother of the child in the transcripted case referenced above.

It seems Mr. Sibley was unaware of the ongoing attorney-client relationship between Adams and Dudley when Adams sanctioned Sibley for attempting to subpoena a copy of a family law text written by Dudley and William Kelly.  The Aransas County District Clerk seems to have conspired with Judge Adams and William Dudley to enrich themselves with fines assessed against Mr. Sibley while denying him the public record to defend himself.   Neither Judge Adams nor Dudley revealed their personal and business relationships to Mr. Sibley or to the child’s mother.

Is this how Judge Adams pays his attorney, with the fines assessed to others?

Judge William Adams & Friends-Symptoms of Greater Ills


Rockport Texas Judge Adams, who is featured in a new viral child abuse video as a man who beats his disabled daughter in an extremely cruel and violent manner with strong sexual overtones, was first exposed for bizarre courtroom antics and turning a child over to a homicidal and suicidal woman over a sane stable mother in this blog.   I and others began our battle to hold this abusive judge accountable almost 13 months ago.

The new video is extremely hard to watch.  However, knowing the judge, the only surprise was that his daughter taped his violence and then distributed it.   Good for her!

But, the video has more impact than just the judge beating his daughter.  It now brings out how three of his good friend family law attorneys whom I watched him dramatically favor in a courtroom above and beyond reasonable judicial behavior had used this judge’s sanction against an attorney for a lawful and legitimate subpoena to make efforts to disbar the attorney representing the sane stable mother.

These are the same three attorneys involved in the abuse of the little 7 year old boy handed over to the homicidal, hallucinating, psychotic.  These attorneys have tried to use another Texas judge to tamper with the boy as a witness and convince the boy to lie that his mother had sexually touched him and that the boy had watched his mother and her attorney in bed having sex.

The three good friends of this sick and perverted Texas judge, no not the unnamed one trying to intimidate the 7 year old, but of the sick perverted Judge Adams, were the same ones to repeatedly use false allegations (admitted and proven false) against my child and me to keep me from protecting my child from a mother who testified the sexual abuse of our child at the age of two by a serial molester convicted of molesting three other little girls, was “humorous” and “appropriate”.   My ex continued to place my child around her convicted molester, sometimes completely alone with him.   These three attorney’s, good friends of William Adams, used a plethora of dirty tricks, including false sex abuse allegations to keep my child with their client, while their judge friends had me paying my ex’s attorney fees “in the Best Interest of the Child” for their false allegations against me.   I have watched them use these and other dirty tricks against others whom we have volunteered our time to assist as they, also, fought these three and their judge buddies.

One, of the three, I had sanctioned but not disbarred by the Texas Bar after she first represented me then represented my ex-wife (three times) and then a visitation center.  Eventually, in Federal Court, Lynette Joubert’s visitation center was shut down in my pro se Federal suit including these three attorneys and my ex-wife.  She was sanctioned after I complained on three separate instances of her coming back into the case against me, AND after helping at least three others make the almost exact same complaints in their own cases.   When I received notice that she was sanctioned in my case, the documents included a sanction for doing the same to a person I had not previously known.

Another of these three attorneys had admitted to abusing my child in front of me, my attorney, a paralegal and a senior forensic pediatric psychologist.    In a discussion of the false allegations attorney William Dudley not only admitted to abusing my child he stated that what he had done to me and my child was the very reason he had vasectomy and raised the step-children of his various wives.

When the local bar grievance committee held the hearing against that attorney, William Dudley, in the first ten seconds, before the hearing was called to order, Dudley proclaimed the witness, Dr. Barbara Beckham, had recanted.   Dr. Beckham was outside the door of the hearing room.  She was called into the hearing, asked if she recanted, and Dr. Beckham stated in no uncertain terms that she had not recanted.  In less than the first 60 seconds of that grievance hearing against Dudley he lied to the committee, then was proven to have lied to the committee with the testimony of the complainant, Dr. Beckham.

William Dudley lied to the grievance committee.  The Texas Bar Rules clearly state that a lawyer “Shall” not lie to any tribunal.   Dudley lied to the tribunal of the grievance committee.   The grievance committee ruled Dudley had done nothing to violate any Bar Rules, including lying to that very committee.  David Sibley filed a grievance against the committee for an obvious fraud in their behavior and ruling.   Nothing was ever heard of that grievance.   It was kept secret, even from Mr. Sibley, the complainant.

The third attorney in this Triad, William Kelly, had knowingly filed false and unfounded allegations against me as a tactic to keep his client from losing custody.  His client is the one who testified the molestation of my child at her second birthday party was ‘humorous’ and ‘appropriate’.   William Kelly’s sister in law was named Attorney ad Litem for my child.   We were not told of this close family relationship.   The attorney ad litem,  Jeannette Cantu-Bazar was caught lying under oath that she had interviewed witnesses who stated I was molesting my child in the playground area of a city park during daylight hours.   The ad litem had to admit she had never talked to the witnesses and when we finally got the names of the witnesses and got them on the stand, they stated the only person they had talked to was my ex-wife and had never talked to Cantu-Bazar.  Cantu-Bazar had submitted a false billing for these falsely claimed interviews.   With transcripts, documents, and witness statements, the local Bar stated there was no evidence against Janette Cantu-Bazar that she had done anything wrong.

An attorney, Sam Westergren, who witnessed William Kelly laughing and joking about keeping my child from me with false allegations, gave me an affidavit of that event.

When William Kelly ran for Corpus Christi city council, I used the affidavit in a campaign brochure against Kelly.  Kelly had Judge Henry Schuble call me into court and gag me.   Political scientist and associate professor at Howard University, Stephen Baskerville, documented this gross denial of civil rights and violation of Federal Law in his bestselling book ‘Taken Into Custody’.    I had distributed 1,000 of the brochures; I had to destroy three thousand just days before the election.   Kelly won by 800 votes.   This was the closest margin in over 15 years for anyone winning that seat on the Corpus City Council.

We eventually got the judge that helped William Kelly  in his campaign reportedly pulled off my case and off theTexas bench alltogether for two full years.  This was the now deceased Judge Henry Schuble.

And, there is so much more that we have carefully documented and maintained archived records on that we can spend years just writing of the abuses committed by several judges and these three attorneys in that on little area of Texas.

This is what Texas Justice is all about.

And, the question begging to be asked… “Where have the FBI and Texas Rangers been all this time?”

After asking for investigations into these two cases and others, I can answer with an age old South Texas saying… “Quien Sabe?”  (Who Knows?)

 

The Child Abusing Judge Adams I Know


Judge William Adams of Rockport, Texas ruled that a homicidal, hallucinatory, psychotic, heavily medicated, suicidal person with whom the child is left with for prolonged periods by the father is not relevant to safety or Best Interest of the Child. I sat in the courtroom and watched this travesty transpire. All present, including the judge’s own staff seemed shocked and taken aback by this bizarre ruling. Is this the real meaning of Best Interest of the Child? Is this how jaded and immune our courts and media have become where real danger is minimized and false allegations lionized?

The visible arrogance of Judge Adams was comparable to the arrogance of the Medieval Italian Prince to whom Machiavelli was writing in the book by the same name, “The Prince”. The judge was exercising raw, unbridled power for which he has nearly absolute immunity. This is the life of a false sex allegation. Just ask Jennifer Mata in Rockport, Texas what it is like to be the target of a conspiracy to falsely accuse

I was in the courtroom that day.   I testified at that hearing.   I watched Judge Adams turn a child over to a woman diagnosed and regularly hospitalized by the Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation as a threat to the general public.   Judge Adams stated that one of the parents promise to leave this child with if they gained  custody, that parent was represented by a cohort of the judge’s personal attorney, William Dudley of Corpus Christi, Texas.    

William Dudley is helping the judge go for custody of another and much younger daughter than the one he beat in the recent viral video.

I was present in the courtroom when Judge Adams stated  that the child’s daycare provider of one of the parents, who claimed they would continue with this daycare,  being diagnosed as sometimes psychotic, hallucinatory, homicidal, suicidal, and drugged beyond the point of being able to drive was irrelevent to the custody issue.

That hearing was a year ago.   Since then the boy, now 7, has continued to be left the majority of the time with this dangerous daycare provider.   CPS has done nothing.

Neighbors of the psychotic woman video taped the young boy on his bicycle in the road in front of the psychotic’s home.  The road is the road to the Corpus Christi dump.  Heavy trucks race up and down the road continually.  The road is narrow with deep ditches on each side.   Texas CPS has refused to act on this neglect and criminal endangerment of this child.

This is a case where I testified to the pattern of false allegations by a set of independent attorneys who claim to be unofficial partners in abuse of parents in family court, a 6 year old child, boy referenced above, made an outcry to his mother that his father, his father’s adult, police sergeant uncle, his father’s attorney, a judge in this case, and the attorney for the father’s attorney met at the child’s favorite local restaurant and was told by the judge and others to lie and say his mother had touched him sexually and that he had watched his mother and her attorney have sex in bed.  The boy refused and then told his mother when he saw her next.

I have a copy of the boy’s recorded testimony to this restaurant meeting.   It is an audiovideo recording I will post when we have redacted the visible portions of the boys face and his name.

The mother’s attorney, Mr. David Sibley, interviewed the owner of the restaurant and received a copy of the ticket for the specific large group table the child stated the party had sat. The correct number of adults and one child was shown on the ticket. The two waiters who attended the table both knew the father and son but not the others. The two waiters confirmed, one with courtroom testimony and the other in a sworn affidavit, the father, son, and others dressed in business attire were at the table at the time the child indicated.

The child further stated the police officer relative drove the judge to child’s aunt’s house, where the other adults went as well. The child said the efforts to get the child to make false allegations by the adults continued at the Aunt’s house.

The young child stated the police officer later drove the judge, whom the child had met in a court appearance, back to the judge’s home in the officer’s patrol car.

Mr. Sibley subpoenaed the GPS records for the official patrol car the child stated the police officer was driving. The GPS records for that car were provided with a fifteen hour gap in the records for that car. The gap corresponds with the time the child stated the meeting was held. The GPS readings stopped at a location far removed from where they resumed almost exactly 15 hours later.

The child was taken to a well experienced pediatric psychologist who discussed the child’s statements with the child and found no cause to disbelieve the child.

The judge and others have refused to deny, on the record that there was a meeting at that restaurant on that date and time.

Police are not investigating this effort to influence a witness to make false allegations. The police are not investigating the use of a police sergeant and his vehicle in the crime of attempting to influence and intimidate a witness to falsely accuse his own mother of sex crimes. The media won’t touch it. And the three Bitchhood spin miesters claim no one is harmed by false allegations. This has been common fare for the past 20 + years in falsely accusing men.

Now for the Piece de resistance, the father states the mother is a good mother but the father wants the aunt, who participated in part of the effort to intimidate the child into making a false outcry against his mother, to be his son’s new mother now that the father and mother are divorced.

The aunt has a history of treatment by Texas State Mental Health and Mental Retardation psychiatrists for being homicidal, hallucinatory, occasionally psychotic, suicidal, suffering from Major Depressive disorder and extremely heavily medicated to control the mental issues. Or at least she is heavily medicated when she takes her prescriptions. The aunt is in denial that she has mental issues and was falsely denying, under oath, that she had been repeatedly hospitalized for her mental illnesses by the State to protect her and others.

How can it be explained away when  The Honorable William Adams of Aransas County, Texas, ruled that the medical condition and records of the father’s preferred care provider, the homocidal, hallucinating and sometimes psychotic caregiverfor his son and the father’s preferred new mother for the child, should he gain custody is not relevant. The judge had only moments before heard the father state that irrespective of medical records, he would ignore the diagnosis and continue to leave his son with this homicidal psychotic.

Domino’s Pizza Daddy Hate Ad Campaign of 2004


 

A Letter That Helped Stop a National Ad Campaign

(The content is as applicable today as it was in 2004)

 

 

Stan Rains wrote a letter to Dominos Pizza concerning its apparent sponsorship of a billboard contest for children which constitutes State Sponsored Parental Alienation Syndrome. It is with special permission from Mr. Rains that we publish it here on the Anti-Peonage Act Website:

 

From: “Stan Rains”

 

Subject: Dominoes Pizza Parental Alienation Ad Campaign

 

Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 16:02:27 -0500

 

 Dear Sad, Sick, Destroyers of Children.

 

I am writing you in reference to your web site http://www.paykids.com/ContestRules.asp .  On this page, you describe a contest rewarding children who can make their non-custodial father look the most hated and despicable.  What are you trying to do to all of those children?  That is a hate crime against the children first and their non-custodial parent second.

 

I have never and hope to never see again any campaign that would ask any child to find ways to make their parent appear as a criminal monster in a drawing.   Do you do that to children of drug dealers, mass murderers?  Would you have children draw pictures of how terrible their alienating, hateful, malicious, child-destroying mother looks to them when she is teaching them to hate their father? 

The father is half the child.  If you teach the child to hate either parent for any reason, you teach the child to hate himself.

 

 Did you know that women file 85 % of the divorces, knowing the devastation this will cause on their children?  The causes women filing divorce in this country for abuse and adultery are only present in about 6.5% of divorce at most.  Bad hair causes more women to file than abuse or unfaithfulness by the men.

 

Do you know that child support paying military personnel killed in action are listed on the States’ and Federal Government’s Deadbeat Lists.  Death is not an option when it comes to paying child support. Getting killed in Combat now gets heroes labeled “Deadbeat”. Now the children not only do not have a father, but their war hero dad is now a low-life scum deadbeat because he is dead.  And you wish to memorialize their dad dad with an ugly drawing on a billboard labeling him deadbeat, criminal and a loser?

 

Did you know that men who become ill or disabled cannot get child support reduced and then make the deadbeat list?

 

Did you know that reservists and National Guardsmen often times make less on active duty than they owe in Child support?  They do not have the time or money to request reductions before combat duty and come home deadbeat in amounts that they cannot catch up on.  They come home and are arrested for serving this nation in war.

 

Did you know that a hostage held in Lebanon for years was arrested when he came home on child support arrearages while he was a political hostage?  The arrest took place in Chicago.

 

Did you know child support paying fathers who died in 9/11 are on the deadbeat dad lists?  Did you know preachers who die of cancer (Rev. Dennis Austin) are now listed as deadbeats?  Death is not an option. Neither is illness, injury, or any other just cause.  Is that the plight of a married father with children of that marriage?  No.  Then why crucify innocent men for the insanity, even temporary, of a wife who finds a hotter lover, or wants to spend more on make-up?  Did you know that is exactly what is happening to more and more women?

 

Did you know that by all studies most of the so called Deadbeat fathers are actually beat down dead by family court systems assessing excessively high child support and failing to enforce visitation with their children after the children were kidnapped by a flighty mother? Most in arrearages are men from lower income categories.  The millionaire deadbeat is urban myth 99.99 % of the time.  There just aren’t enough millionaires, deadbeat or not to fill that claim.  So you have a man struggling to make ends meet and marginally employable and you wish to further disenfranchise and criminalize him, then heap indignity upon him by having his children make him look like a monster?

 

 Did you know that the tax advantages and tax free income, social services denied to men but provided to women, only, actually encourage divorce, the number one destroyer of today’s children?  

Did you know that in tax advantages alone, a woman leaving a man realizes an immediate $3,000. + a year advantage? 

Did you also know that she will have immediate access to all types of social services immediately upon divorce that are not accessible to any man?

 

 Have you ever done the math on child support?  If a man is making even as high as $40,000/year gross income.  He will be required to pay at least 20 % before taxes (20% of gross income).  His I.R.S. tax will be 28% of his gross income (20 + 28 = 48%).  Then he will be required to pay Social Security Tax of 15.3 of his gross (20% + 28% + 15.3% = 63.3%).  And then there is State Income tax of about 5% (63.3%+5% =68.3% of his gross income).  If he is or was self-employed, then he has upwards of 6-8% more of his gross he must pay out in taxes, which I will ignore at this point.

 

 Now we multiply the $40,000 times 68.3% and get $27,320.  Now we take $40,000. and subtract the $27,320 and we get what is left, $12,680. or 31.7% of his income is what he superficially gets to keep to actually live on. This is well below poverty level.  This does not take into account the requirement for a man who has gone from middle class to below poverty level to also provide health insurance for his child ($50-$100/mo at the least) and to pay for his wife’s attorney, any social workers and psychologist ($200-400/mo). Then, the father, if his wife allows him to see his children, must care for and entertain his children when he does have them at the whims and fancy of the abandoning wife.   His wife, whom the vast majority of the time abandoned the home and kidnapped the children for no reason other than chasing a pipe dream now claims head of household, is eligible for multiples of services ranging from welfare, to free legal counsel as a reward for divorcing a man who was innocent.  I will be glad to provide you with the links to various federal studies documenting these statements with peer-reviewed reports.

 

 Child support for this $40,000/year man was not just $8,000. The ex got the money tax-free. Tax-free means she got an amount to spend that would take anyone else upwards of $12,000. a year in gross to enjoy.  And that is what that cost the man, $12,000. because he paid the taxes.  He also paid the taxes on the health care, and on the payments to her lawyer, psychologist, etc. were assessed by the court as child support.  For a divorce he did not deserve, or want he is not allowed to live .

 

 If the man gets behind, he can loose professional licenses (Tim Emerson, M.D.  of San Angelo, TX.), drivers licenses, even hunting and fishing licenses so he is criminalized if he catches his own food since he is not allowed money to eat.

 

 Also, have you ever researched the destruction of a child and their adulthood from having been aggressively alienated from a parent as a child?  There are numerous web sites dealing with this issue, including groups of adults struggling with the aftermath of having been alienated from a loving parent.

 

 Child support is regularly used as a tool by unethical judges to imprison or to chase off a loving and dedicated father insisting on being a part of his child’s life.  That is not even disputed by Michigan’s A.G.  And, you wish to be a part of such fraud.  I would imagine whatever feminist sold you on this idea did not have you do any real or meaningful study on this course of action before taking it. This tragedy of stolen children and fraudulent child support awards has reached the levels that every family has been hit.  Every family has lost access to at least one child as a result of Parental Alienation. And you wish to encourage this destruction.

 

The greatest classification of suicide in the 18-35 age group is men who have lost their family, home, income, savings, livelihood and respect for nothing they did wrong.   We loose more men to this cause in two years than we did in two decades in Vietnam.

 

Have you looked into how child support is actually assessed and the formula that is used?  Of course not.  You are not really concerned about children but on jumping on a PC band wagon to sell Pizza.  What extreme feminist sold you on this very destructive ad campaign?   Every family has lost access to at least one child from Parental Alienation. And you want to formalize and praise further destruction of these children.

 

I will boycott your local stores until such time as you publicly apologize for intentionally encouraging custodial parents to brainwash their children against struggling non-custodial parents.  I will make copies of your PayKids.com website and pass them out to local veterans groups, pta groups, and in front of your stores with maps to your competitions stores and even your competitions menu’s and discount coupons where I can find them.  Why didn’t you offer second jobs to struggling dad that allowed them time off when the get their kids.  Or a contest where children draw the picture of the monster, criminal judge that keeps them from seeing and being with their loving father.  Let’s see you put that on a billboard.

 

By the way, my child was molested by my ex’s nephew at the age of 2.  My ex moved into the convicted molesters home.  He was also convicted of molesting three other little girls.  I have been bankrupted in the last ten years attempting to protect my child.  The courts have used child support as a tool to silence my objection to my child being in my wife’s custody  and to my demanding that at the very least the courts enforce it’s own  visitation orders.  After knowingly destroying my business and   declaring me indigent on his own accord, the judge in our case then, knowing I was now unemployed, at his orders, then doubled the child support payments.  This was a means to make me go away and quite attempting to actually expect my child to be protected.  These statements are a matter of public record.

 

If you do not remove this ad campaign page from your website and drop this campaign teaching children to hate their fathers and themselves, I will make sure that I cost you as many customers as I can and I will make your really abusive campaign the most expensive and ill-advised effort your Corporation has ever made.

 Sincerely,

Stanley A. Rains, Jr.

 

 

           

Visitation Center Dracula


 

(First published in Fathermag.com, August 2000) 

by Stan Rains

Federal funding for supervised visitation programs is supposed to be based on substantiated child abuse, not some crap about “best interests of the child.” Federal law 42 U.S.C. 2000 h-7 and 2000(d)(2) holds that if a state receives federal funding for any program, it waives sovereign immunity to be sued if it discriminates and violates the Equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. –Bruce Eden, Divorce Reform Coalition of NJ.

If false sex abuse allegations are the “atomic bomb” of custody battles, then supervised visitation is the Dracula. For a father to visit his children at a supervised visitation center in my part of the world, it can cost upward of $300. or more a month. The money is a major drain, but the worst blood letting is the formalized Parental Alienation efforts of the visitation centers.

Falling under the maxim that “power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” visitation centers subject their “client children” and “visiting” parents to a gamut of demeaning and disruptive bites to the jugular vein. Children are acutely aware of the ever present, note taking case workers and of the cameras located every 10 feet along the walls.

I have seen a parent and child cling to one another and stare back at the narrow eyed, stern visages of several caseworkers studying this parent and child clinging to one another in terror and desperation. They reminded me of two neurotic and traumatized research monkeys reacting to the observations of white frocked researchers, conditioned to the fact that these white coated observers had the power to inflict pain, anguish and even death. With this parent child pair, their desperate, mutual clinging to one another seemed to be viewed negatively by the case workers. The parent and child have not been back to the center since. Was that the death of a parent/child relationship? What crime did that child commit to be subjected to such cruel torture?

Visitation Centers often contract out with State Child Welfare Agencies. These agencies are concerned with creating cases for the Fed’s bounty money on child abuse cases ‘created’ in each state. Child Welfare Supervisors receive pay proportionate to the number of case workers beneath them. The number of case workers for an area are determined by the number of cases ‘created.’ Child Welfare agencies are known to work with the contractors who assist in validating ‘created’ cases and who can create new cases. That is a major cause of the intrusive scrutiny at the visitation centers. Are these contract centers concerned with the children or the funding? Money and power have an odd affect on many people.

The demeaning of the “visiting” parent is readily visible from the minute that a person enters the “secured facility” with armed guards, officious case workers with their clipboards and arrogant, domineering managers with business backgrounds–not child development, psychology, or even social work training. The child’s impression is that all of these authority figures see Daddy as a serious and dangerous threat. The only time a child sees this type of security is on TV showing prisons filled with bad people. It leaves a child with an impression that their love for Daddy is dangerous and bad, and so is Daddy. And to take it a step further into reality, the natural progression of a child’s self worth is that if “Daddy is bad and I love Daddy, then I am Bad”. And they wonder why children of “throw away” dads are prone to so many destructive behaviors.

The center’s management sets rules to ‘train’ parents in proper parenting time at the visitation center. This forced, but very unofficial parent training, is based on a business manager’s personal experience and idealism, not on the recommendations of any professional knowledgeable in parent/child needs or interactions. The intrusion cuts into the spontaneity and naturalness of a parent/child interaction.

An even greater stressor on the parent/child interaction is the knowledge that a poor review by a case worker, who has no formal training, essentially puts the case worker in the position of complainant, witness, prosecutor, judge, jury, and executioner of the ability of a parent and child to see each other. Caseworkers, often young, childless, and generally with little or no formal education, correct parents and children alike, openly, for all to hear with their corrections based on personal bias, unresolved issues and idealism. Caseworkers who dislike a parent will let everyone in the facility know by broadcasting through glares, tone, stance, and attitude. Children are very attuned to these things especially from authority figures. Many times the case workers disapproval is rooted in other than professional reasons–appearance and social skills seems to be a major factor.

Intense note taking by the case workers is done to develop negative issues, no matter whether the issues are grounded in reality. These notes are cumulative. So is the effect.

Judges use visitation centers to avoid responsibility. Judges and attorneys use visitation centers to ameliorate their guilt at taking a child’s daddy away from the child. Judges, attorneys and Child Welfare use visitation centers to validate their personal agendas more often than the centers are used for the best interest of a child. The child is the last factor of the equation.

How long can a parent or child withstand this steady, relational bloodletting to maintain any kind of healthy relationship? Brad Ingram wrote of his concern that children may loose interest under such pressure and end up with memories of rubber stamp visits instead of a childhood of meaningful memories and experiences with Dad. How long do we have to wait for our children to be allowed to feel they have two parents, not just one parent and a “visitor” with no anchoring relationship? Is it any wonder that America has more police per capita than any other country in the world? Is it any wonder that America has a per capita prison population comparable to the former Soviet Union and its infamous Gulag Archipelago? Stephen Baskerville regularly puts forth the concept that indirectly, and sometimes directly, Fatherhood is a crime in America. If you are a father, you are already a criminal. You just may not have begun your punishment, yet.

The parent/child pair mentioned above in this letter were a mother and her daughter. Did parent/child gender change your view or feelings of that picture? Why? Did gender make it more or less shameful or justifiable? Should any child or parent, male or female, be subject to this kind of cruel and unusual punishment without any conviction of wrong doing? Is motherhood next to be criminalized?