All posts in category Corrupt Courts

How To Start Cleaning-Up Texas Family Court Judges


If you were a corrupt judge, would you want your misdeeds aired on YouTube minutes after you behaved badly or even criminally while on the bench? That is why judges Texas are fighting against being forced to have audio video recording in their courtroom that is available to anyone who asks.

Texas has no audio-video transcription of court proceedings. Yet, Texas has one of the highest felony conviction rates of judges in the U.S. And there is a real problem, throughout the U.S. It has become so common that there is a name for it, The Black Robe Disease.

And little is being done by the mechanisms set up to keep judges ethical and lawful. A prime example is how Judge William Adams was allowed to return to the bench after his disabled daughter posted a video online.

Three years later at his next election the voters booted William Adams out, but in the three years remaining on his term, he worked hard at retaliating against the man who defeated him in the election and he used the Texas Bar to retaliate against other attorneys who had been working to rid our citizens of the parasite judge.

Court Transcripts are often as false as a hookers claim of virginity. And the lies will always be in favor of making the judge look good.

Most judges appoint their own bailiffs and court reporters. Their choices are often more personal and political than for efficiency of court business, unless you consider the rogue judges consider court proceedings to be their personal self-aggrandizing and enrichment. Rarely do the court personnel report bad judges, the work is too lucrative in these hard times.

This brings us to the real problem of falsified records of court proceedings.

Court reporters lucrative jobs are basically political appointments by the judge for whom they work. Court Transcripts are routinely and regularly edited by the court reporters and often at the judge’s direct instruction to change the transcript to fit the judge’s personal and political needs and wants. The court reporter is a bigger player in the courtroom than anyone outside of the judge in whether or not there is any semblance of due process and a fair chance at appeal. And that has been subverted for decades in Texas.

Court reporters are paid county salaries of between $60,000 and $85,000 a year and are provided their equipment, supplies, and offices at county expense, however the transcripts they make on county time, in the courthouse, with county supplies is considered by the court to be the court reporters personal property and the transcripts the court reporter sells to the litigants and others, again, using county supplies to print work done completely at county expense for personal profit. This can double or triple the income for a court reporter over their county salary. What are the pressures the judge can apply to a reticent court reporter who is making $120 thousand to $300 thousand a year with no overhead and most of it on a cash basis.

Tell me how much you would trust the court reporter to provide a transcript of a judge threatening to murder a litigant, from the bench. Or, telling a desperate parent the someone else’s molestation of the parent’s two year old child was ‘OK and just people being people’. I don’t know who they hang out with to have them believe that child molestation is somehow ‘OK’ by OK people.

Texas judges were being convicted of felonies, through 2013, at rates of two to ten times the rate of the rest of the citizens of Texas. We have been seeing felony convictions at rates of several per hundred judges whereas in a given year in the general public we see about 4 to 6 per thousand. Those judges who were successfully prosecuted were the most blatant of offenders who were caught.

Invariably, most of those convicted judges’ worst and most criminal acts were on the bench. Most stayed on their bench for prolonged periods after the allegations came to light, continuing to lash out at the community and individuals that was attempting to get rid of them. The many escapades of the Texas Judges, William Adams, Henry Schuble, Bobby Galvan and others in a small central Texas Gulf Coast area speak volumes about the lackadaisical attitude of monitoring agencies and other judges ignoring and allowing out of control judiciary to terrorize and destroy many in the community for the fun, profit, and perversions of the corrupt ones.

If a crooked judge is allowed to stay in office by other judges, which judges are worse, the ones acting criminally towards the public, or those allowing it? Shouldn’t we remove those judges made culpable by their own silence in a community?

When there is video of court hearings available to all immediately after the court is adjourned, the removal of judges can be swift. When there is no video it is difficult to quickly remove, or even prove these judges are the criminals their actions belie.

With mandatory 24-7 audio-video (AV) recording of courts we can help protect our courts and our rights from abuses.

These are the people who are making rulings about the lives of our children, our homes, and our futures.

In 2004, the front page of the Corpus Christi Caller-Times had an article about a 2003 Texas survey by the judiciary on the public’s opinion of the judiciary. As it turned out 85% of Texans believed that judges made their rulings based on money, sex, friendship, family, or politics over facts and law. Is your opinion of our courts any different.

There are any number of national surveys and organizations that have pointed out the abuses of the criminals, sociopaths, and tyrants on our courts’ benches. Isn’t it time we began to hold them accountable for their crimes against men, women, children, and even humanity, itself?

Power corrupts, Power without accountability corrupts completely. Our courts have slowly developed for themselves and others within government the old concept of Sovereign Immunity. It is the concept that the King is immune from the laws since he makes the laws. Let that sink in for a minute and then watch these two videos. Keep in mind, I have, personally, seen worse, in open court, including a judge threatening to send a man to jail so the judge could have a lifer murder him in exchange for the lifer getting a prison cell near his family. I have watched judges laugh at children being molested. I have watched judges openly state they are knowingly violating an individual’s Constitutional Rights, and more. Those who have ever spent much time in court will agree, our judges have become ‘Blacked Robed Tyrants’ as I heard the president of an attorney’s association testify before The Texas Sunset Commission when it was reviewing the Judicial Conduct Commission and its failures to rein in the bad judges in Texas.

Without Video, who would have moved forward on this to quickly rid our courts of these men and women infected with the ‘Black Robe Disease’?

Even with video, the power mad sociopaths who inhabit our courts all too frequently, will still hurt and harm. But at least we will have a way to rapidly address and remove judges without it taking years and finally an election.

Not even sexual predation is outside the scope of abuse in court, and family courts are the worst.

The problem is more complex than can be cured by the simple installation and maintenance of cameras in our courts, we must also address the issues of out of control Sovereign immunity. However, AV recording of all hearings or those hearings without AV of both the courtroom and judge available, unedited are void, would quickly begin the process of cleaning up the tyranny of bad and even evil judges. Best of all, it allows the public to see, as with Judge William Adams beating of his disabled child, and take the needed action at the polls if the judicial monitoring agencies fail to protect the public, again, Judge Adams is a great example of that ‘turning a blind eye’ towards the evil of one of their own over the public’s right to fair and SANE judges.

3 Comments
by thepatriotdad on October 18, 2014  •  Permalink
Posted in Corrupt Courts, family, Gender Biased Courts, Judicial Corruption, misandry, Parental Alienation, Paternity Fraud, Poverty, Texas Bar Corruption, Texas Corruption, Texas Judicial Review Corrupt, Texas Judiciary
Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Posted by thepatriotdad on October 18, 2014

https://thepatriotdad.wordpress.com/2014/10/18/why-we-need-audio-video-court-transcripts-in-texas/

Texas Family Judge Marching Orders


“Domestic violence is criminal conduct. It is the result of a conscious choice made by one party to an intimate relationship (statistically, that party is usually male)” Hon. Diane Kiesel, Preface to Domestic Violence: Law, Policy, and Practice
Diane Kiesel

For Texas Fathers, forget all the family code and Constitutional arguments.  Here are the marching orders for judges. It is the new guidelines published on a stand alone basis. The hidden rules for judges is openly biased against men, it states this in the preface using false and a vague reference to ‘statistics’ as support for the misandry in the statement. The current peer reviewed work has shown that women are at least as culpable and violent as men in all forms of DV, but most especially they are the prime actors and participants in DV abuse of children.

These Family Law hidden rules were previously hidden in desk reference book for judges handling family law titled the Texas Bench Book.  That book of guidelines, for nearly all issues a judge would most likely experience in court, is only 442 pages. The Bench Book was bad enough against men. However the DV Bench Book turns judges against men before the case is ever heard using false and unsubstantiated vague ‘statistics’ reference by a known biased judge. The new book is extreme ex parte to the point of being openly and commercially evil.

The new book is paid for with VAWA funds. I will provide support for this statement further down this blog post.

aaa Angry Judge

To repeat myself for emphasis, this stand alone book of DV marching orders for judges in handling family cases even states its bias against men in the opening statements in the preface.

“Domestic violence is criminal conduct. It is the result of a conscious choice made by one party to an intimate relationship (statistically, that party is usually male)”

This is openly declared misandry.

In that original Texas Bench Book and the newly published 1033 page Texas Domestic Violence Bench Book are these hidden rules that are used to ambush and surprise fathers in the middle of protecting children from maternal abuse.  Have no hesitation, Domestic Violence is, also, maternal abuse of children. 

In the Texas Domestic Violence Bench Book you will find why hearing go so wrong in the face of evidence and even admissions by women of crimes against men and children. It will give you insight into the open hostility of judges to even decent fathers. The preface defines who the victims are (women) and who the perpetrators nearly always are (men). It is right down the NY radfem policy guidelines.
A Angry Judge

It only gets worse from there.  The above statement defines males as the ones with all the ‘dangerous’ qualities and women with none of them (except in the rare cases where a judge can not shift blame to a man).

We, now, have access to this codex of crime against fathers and children by the courts.  This codex of judicial crime against men and children can be found in The Texas Family Violence Bench Book.

 

These bench books for Texas Judges can be googled and found with the simple word clouds “Texas Bench Book” and “Texas Domestic Violence Bench Book”.

Every state will have a similar book. These books on Family Law with the hidden rules for judges decisions are created with special VAWA grants provided through the DOJ as is stated in the first paragraph of an opening letter from the Texas Chief Supreme Court Justice, Wallace B. Jefferson at the very front of the Texas Family Law Bench Book.

The Hon. Diane Kiesel is known as an extremely biased judge. Why would it surprise anyone that a quote is taken from a Municipal Court Judge in NYC as a statement of great import in the preface to the most important text to your children in the State of Texas.

Here is a quote on the opinion of Diane Kiesel:
“Kiesel is so openly pro prosecution, so astonishingly biased, and so relentlessly nasty that even assistant district attorneys quietly acknowledge it – and they use it, steering almost all of their cases before her toward bench rather than jury trials. When confronted by a touch case, or a recalcitrant witness, they simply “reduce the case.” That is, they cleanly and tactically lower the charges from class A misdemeanors to class B misdemeanors, depriving the defendant of a jury trial but not the possibility of a jail sentence.

Source: David Feige. Indefensible: One Lawyer’s Journey into the Inferno of American Justice. New York: Little, Brown, and Company. 2006. Excerpted from Chapter 10. Reprinted with permission.” The full article can be found here.

Here are additional Bench Books that are relevant to fathers and their battles with family courts:

http://texaschildrenscommission.gov/media/16497/BenchBook.pdf This bench book was made publically accessible on Dec. 20, 2013.

3 Comments
by thepatriotdad on April 6, 2014  •  Permalink
Posted in Child Abuse, Child Custody, Corrupt Courts, Divorce, family, Feminism, Gender Bias, Gender Biased Courts, Gendercide, Judicial Corruption, misandry, Parental Alienation, Texas Corruption, Texas Judiciary, Uncategorized
Tagged , , , ,

Posted by thepatriotdad on April 6, 2014

https://thepatriotdad.wordpress.com/2014/04/06/texas-family-judge-marching-orders/

Grievance Against Galvan, Alcala, Adams


Following this brief prologue is a copy of the actual background narrative and grievance filed against Judge Bobby Galvan and others through the Texas Sunset Commission at it’s public hearing on review of the Judicial Conduct Commission (JCC).  The JCC is up for review and is under intense scrutiny for the rogue and tyrannical actions of Texas Judges without accountability.  

In regards to the grievant, at the mother’s request, I have not included the videos provided to the Sunset Commission showing her son testifying and being interviewed by professionals as the boy stands firm in his allegations that a judge, his father, and named attorneys tried to get him to make false sex abuse allegations.  The mother is concerned about the child’s safety and privacy.   That request is being honored. 

The request is honored, though the videos show the child’s consistency in statements and in the case of being intensely interrogated with leading and very authoritarian questions by one of the alleged conspirators, Lanette Joubert, the boy was unwavering.   Lanette Joubert, one of the ‘alleged’ conspirators, very firmly asks the 6 year old boy, “I WASN’T THERE WAS I?”  to which the little boy bravely answered, “Yes you were.”. 

The little boy has been unflappable in his contention that these conspirators were attempting to get him to lie about his mommy, even though he had no grasp of how destructive the lie about ‘bad touches’ and watching ‘mommy in bed with David’ (the mother’s attorney) could result in lengthy prison terms for mommy and David.  ‘Mommy and David’ would have been convicted on only the statements of a child under pressure from those present, Daddy, unethical attorneys, a powerful judge, and the boys police sargeant uncle in uniform.   My child at the age of 4 told me of being spanked for not saying ‘bad things about daddy’.   My daughter was regularly punished at a very early age for not helping her mother with her plots to falsely imprison me.  My daughter withstood secret interviews by at least two judges.  My daughther withstood Lanette’s employees efforts to extract a false allegation from my child in Lanette’s visitation center.  I eventually shut down her center in a Federal Civil Rights action in the Victoria, Texas Federal Court.  And later, as covered below, in another matter, obtained a sanction through the BAR against Lanette Joubert for unethical behavior to her own clients. It seems, as a matter of public record,  Ms. Joubert will burn her own clients as readily as her opponents in false allegations and schemes for profit.  Others have come forward with similar evidence against Ms. Joubert and two of her cronies.

I believe the child, the waiters, and the table ticket that corroborates the event the child describes.   From what my public record experiences are with Galvan and his good friend William Kelly, the opposition attorney, jailing me for paying ahead on child support; placing my child with a man-hating social worker who was used exclusively by the local prosecutor to create allegations against men in un-recorded interviews of children and whose stated goal was to have my daughter tell me that she did not want to continue visitation to improve my child’s confidence, while not addressing my ex continuing to place my child around her convicted molester; and watching as William Kelly forcefully screamed at Judge Galvan with complete impugnity for a good 5 minutes demanding the judge jail me even longer for having paid ahead on child support to his client.   I believe Judge Bobby Galvan to be quite capable of what the child has alleged and the witnesses and evidence indicates.

Below is the body of the grievance with links to some of the more direct evidence provided to the Sunset Review Commission.

 

GRIEVANCE AGAINST THE HONORABLE BOBBY GALVAN, TEXAS DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS

GRIEVANCE AGAINST THE HONORABLE WILLIAM ADAMS, COUNTY COURT AT LAW, ARANSAS COUNTY, TEXAS

GRIEVANCE AGAINST VISITING JUDGE ALCALA

Please find the following background and Judicial Complaint against Judge Bobby Galvan for his alleged collusion in witness tampering and child abuse (enticing a child to falsely accuse an innocent parent). 

Further neither Judge William Adams nor Judge Alcala, who have been presented more evidence than is used to put many men on death row, did not act for the safety of the child. 

Judge William Adams of Youtube child beating infamy and Judge Alcala, should they have not reported to the judicial review authorities, the actions of Judge Galvan as came into their knowledge, both violated judicial ethics rules and colluded with Judge Galvan to create false allegations against innocent parties for self-aggrandizing benefit.

This is a regular pattern and practice in the general Corpus Christi, central Gulf Coast area, determined by a Civil Trial Lawyers group to be the second most judicially corrupt area of the U.S, second only to Dade County, Florida.   Three attorneys seem to be at the heart of most of the more egregious abuses in Family Law in this area, regularly and openly colluding with certain judges in the area.

In the Jennifer Flores-Lamb case we have judges assisting cronies in activity that is not just unethical, but has felony criminal implications in the actions alleged of Judge Bobby Galvan, attorneys Lanette Joubert, William Dudley, and William Kelly.    We have a judge, Aransas County Court at Law Judge William Adams, who is ruling that it is not relevant that the father’s desired ‘New Mother’ for his child who will be caring for the child 5 to 6 days a week for over 12 hours a day is HOMOCIDAL, SUICIDAL, HALLUCINATORY, PART TIME PSYCHOTIC, REGULARLY HOSPITALIZED BY THE STATE AS A THREAT TO HERSELF AND OTHERS AND EXTREMELY HEAVILY MEDICATED WHEN NOT TRYING TO KILL HERSELF OR OTHERS. (author’s recent note for Blog readers: This testimony  begins on page 98 of the transcript at 20101011 Transcript Part 2.)

Followed, in the same hearing, were sanctions against the child’s mother and attorney for addressing this early exposed effort to create false sex abuse allegations.   This is a pattern that is well documented.  The attorney’s alleged at the meeting have done this to innumerable innocent parents over the past twenty years.  At this time there is another case of an attorney who is suing for having been knowingly falsely accused by one of these same attorneys with involvement by these same three attorneys in the Titus Mata case.

In the past 17 years of battling the same three attorneys, who have involved the three judges in this complaint, and other crony judges in an effort to protect my child from her convicted serial child abuser in my ex’s family and in defending myself from strategic false allegations against me by these unethical players, I have spent more time in court than most trial lawyers.   In 2003, alone, I spent 41 days in court when the court was only open a reported 162 days that year.  The allegations against me count into at least a thousand over 17 years.  The costs to my daughter, family, friends, State coffers, etc.    have been horrendous.  All for the edification and minor enrichment of the three attorney’s in the Titus Mata abuse allegations.

I have watched men sentenced to life and to long prison terms on less evidence and no child’s statement than what was presented by Jennifer Flores-Lamb and Mr. David Sibley on this effort to falsely accuse by Judge Galvan, Mr William Dudley, Mr. William Kelly, and Mrs. Lanette Joubert.

Attorneys and the process become extremely abusive and dangerous to the innocent when Judge’s are not held accountable for what they allow in their courts or what they themselves do.

I have been a victim of many of these same efforts to falsely criminalize me.   I am even working on a manuscript to track the common pattern of false allegations.  This corruption is where attorneys work in conjunction with cronies in the judiciary to knowingly assist in false allegations and even to make the allegations themselves.   It is only with a team effort that I and other(s) have survived.   We have several instances of this in my case and others we have observed an in which we have assisted.  

I have had judges ordering me to stop taping exchanges where I was protected by having the recordings of the dates and times of the false violence allegations and even false sexual assault allegations.  

I have had judges state I could be making child porn by taping exchanges of my child where my ex was calling the police on the average of every third time we had to meet to exchange our child.   More time was spent trying to find a time and date where I was not documented than in protecting my child from regular exposure to her molester and other child abusers, as testified by my ex, in her family.

I have had one judge removed from my case and reportedly from any State bench for two years.   Judge Henry Schuble was sanctioned for secret orders in my case while the vast majority of secret orders with secret hearings with no notice were and are completely ignored by the Judicial Review Process.    It was too little, too late.   My daughter was a teenager and three recent psychologists stated she had probably continued to be abused up into her current memory.   Her cousin was convicted of molesting her at her second birthday party.

I have a capias for my arrest that has been in my file for the last 10 years from a secret contempt hearing with no notice on file.   The capias has not been processed.  It was for not paying an ad litem, Jeanette Cantu-Bazar’s bill for what she had testified were false reports of sexual assault of my child that Jeanette had fabricated, along with claims to have interviewed witnesses with whom she had never actually talked.  Jeanette was the sister-in-law of William Kelly, my ex’s attorney. 

I have had Judge Rose Vela sign a fraudulent felony conviction order where no notice of hearing had been given, no hearing held, and no evidence given before her.  Yet, I have no felony on my record at this time.  The order is still sitting in my file, #97-2091 in the Nueces County Courthouse.   I complained to the judicial review commission and there was nothing done.

These are only two examples of the abuses committed by judges colluding with a particular group of three attorneys in the Corpus area.   I was being punished for not abandoning my child to my ex and her pedophile family members.   My ex testified that the molestation of our daughter at the age of two was both “humorous” and “appropriate” in the day before our divorce was final.  My ex had moved in with the family member convicted of serial pedophilia before the divorce was over.   I was given visitation over 50% of my child’s time, “To protect your child”, but my ex was given custody so I had no authority. 

This would not be done with accountability methods in place.

This family relationship was only recently discovered (between William Kelly and Jeanette Cantu-Bazar).   Jeanette made the false allegations against me while she was a Corpus Christi Municipal Court Judge, appointed through the efforts of city councilman William Kelly.   The judicial review system and the Bar both ignored the perjuries and frauds of Jeanette and the many other judges and same three attorneys, Kelly, Joubert, and Dudley,  that were documented through her own court room testimony and admissions.

On another occasion, I had a psychologist who was a friend and drinking buddy of Judge Henry Schuble, state he believed an allegation against me of sexual abuse of a child.  However, that psychologist stated to me and my attorney that he only did it for political reasons.  He wanted more business from the judge and William Kelly.   We got him to admit to this under oath.

I had Lanette Joubert sanctioned by the Bar for some of her egregious acts against me in relation to this false allegation and others.  Mrs. Joubert routinely represents first one party then the other and making false allegations against the first party she represented.  The Bar document notifying me of this is attached and labeled “Bar Notice….” .   The sanction was a $600 assessment for the Bar’s attorney and a requirement to take an ethics class.   Ms. Joubert was rewarded for her abuses by not having any real or lasting sanction to send others a message.   I have since witnessed Ms. Joubert use the exact same unethical behavior in another case and have obtained the transcript of her open court admissions of conflict of interest against a prior paying client, who was objecting.  Ms. Joubert was allowed to continue in her gross conflict of interest by this additional judge.

I have documented 8 others whose complaints for the exact same acts fell on deaf ears with the Bar and the local judges allow her to abuse litigants with impunity.   She destroys families.   This is done in collusion with various judges in the area who laughingly allow extreme abuses of the process and system.  If there were accountability for the judge’s, most of these victims may actually have a running chance.

William Dudley admitted to me, David Sibley, Dr. Beckham, and others that he was knowingly abusing my child and admitted this before Judge Henry Schuble who laughed and was entertained by this as Judge Henry Schuble. 

Included in the attached DVD is a campaign brochure,  with an attorney’s affidavit testifying to William Kelly’s efforts to remove me from my child’s life and hand my child over completely to my ex and her family members who had already been convicted of molesting my child and other children and alleged to have molested even my ex and her sister as children.   The brochure was in Mr. Kelly’s first election run for Corpus Christi City council.  

Mr. Kelly had Judge Henry Schuble order me gagged and to destroy my brochures.   I had to destroy 3,000 of them.  Kelly won by only 800 votes, the smallest margin in nearly two decades for council seat in Corpus.  The gag order on me is covered in a text book, “Taken Into Custody”  that was on best seller lists for nearly two years, written by a political science professor, Dr. Stephen Baskerville.  This is the same Mr. Kelly allegedly at the restaurant with Titus.

I understand the process and these particularly criminal attorneys and judges.

Titus Mata, a child, and Jennifer Flores-Lamb, the mother:

I wish to report through the Sunset Commission, evidence and testimony alleging a Texas District Judge  was actively participating in an effort to intimidate a child into making a false allegation against his mother and her attorney.   The judge was stated to have been acting in collusion with an attorney that all in the area acknowledge the judge provides preferential rulings and almost exclusive appointments of financially lucrative assignments.  The attorney is William Kelly, the stated close friend of Judge Galvan. 

I and others have witnessed Kelly screaming at Judge Galvan for several minutes in open court with complete impunity.    I believe the actions in the Titus Mata case are the common patterns and practices of the attorneys and Judges involved.

Mr. Kelly has been involved in the sanctioning of one judge, Henry Schuble and public embarrassment of other judges, yet, continues to insinuate himself into the graces of other judges, such as Galvan, to embarrass and endanger his career.

Ms. Flores-Lamb, Jennifer, has been punished and fined for stopping a false allegation from developing against her.  The false allegation process was discovered early.   Jennifer and her attorney made every effort to expose this criminal activity.  They were fined for their efforts but did not face the severe criminal charges for which they were being set-up.

I have watched and assisted in the defense of Ms. Flores-Lamb as the same three attorney’s, Kelly, Joubert, and Dudley, working with colluding judges have begun the process of criminalizing not just Ms. Florez-Lamb, but also, her attorney David Sibley.   I have lived through 14 known efforts to accuse me of child sexual assault.   I have survived thousands of false allegations of DV, stalking, harassment, etc.  by video and audio recording all interactions with my ex-wife and mother of my child.  She once testified to making 50 false allegations against me in one two week period of time to at least three different law enforcement agencies and the Texas CPS.   The judges were entertained, yet refused to protect my child from her convicted molester or me from the false allegations used to attempt to keep me from discovering the abuses and endangerments of my child.

A child’s testimony, just as in many sex offenses against children, was what exposed an alleged plot by several attorney’s, a sitting Texas District Judge, and the child’s father.   The plot was to have the child state that the child had been sexually touched by the mother and had been made to watch the child’s mother and attorney in bed.

On Saturday, September 18, 2010, Titus Mata was taken to his favorite restaurant, near his father’s home.  They went there to have lunch with a number of individuals.  The child, in his own words in the videos,  clearly states who was present.   In the video labeled “Titus on Seating Arrangement”, (at the mother’s request the videos showing her son are only available to the authorities concerned) the child, Titus Mata, son of Andrew Mata and Jennifer Flores-Lamb, explains who sat in what location at the table where Titus states Judge Bobby Galvan, Lanette Joubert, William Dudley, and William Kelly sat.   This video was taken Thursday, September 26, 2010.

Two waiters attended that particular table on the date and time Titus stated he and his father met with Judge Galvan, Lanette Joubert, William Kelly, William Dudley, and Titus’ Uncle, a Corpus Christi Police sergeant named ‘Junior’.   Both waiters recognized Titus.  One was out of town at the time of the October 11, 2010 hearing where this matter was first raised before the court.  The other testified at that hearing and his testimony is attached in the transcript provided titled 20101011_Transcript_Part_2(1).  This second waiter corroborated the child’s statement as to seating arrangements of the child and the other people at the table.   The waiter corroborated the correct number of people at that table.  The testifying waiter testified to recognizing the child and father as regulars at that restaurant.

The owner of the restaurant, Mandarin Gardens, in Corpus Christi, provided a copy of the table ticket for the exact date and time Titus stated the meeting was held where efforts were made to get him to make a false allegation against his mother and her attorney.  This ticket, which was admitted into evidence in the October 10, 2010 hearing is included in the DVD, and is titled Restaurant_Ticket[1]Mr. David Sibley, one of the targets of the alleged effort to create false allegations against Jennifer and himself, upon hearing of the child’s allegations against these adults recommended the employment of a forensic pediatric psychologist, Dr. Barbara Beckham.  Dr. Beckham interviewed Titus.  This interview is on the video labeled “Beckham_Interview”  provided in the CD with this report. 

Dr. Beckham testified in the October 11, 2010 hearing as to the determined truthfulness of Titus in his statements.   Dr. Beckham’s testimony can be found in (1) on pages 108  through page 121

Judge William Adams of the Youtube child beating infamy, was the judge sitting in this hearing.   He had sanctioned Mr. Sibley for subpoenaing records from attorney William Dudley and ordered Mr. Sibley to pay Mr. Dudley a considerable sum.   It was not disclosed at that time that Judge Adams had employed Mr. Dudley for the judge’s own custody case of a daughter who was younger than the M.S. afflicted child he was recorded beating.

Here are the judge’s own words, taken from  20101011_Transcript_Part_2(1)

“I find that the allegations in your motion,

most of them, Mr. Sibley, are baseless and groundless.

And I’m just rereading the supplemental motion that you

filed. And I didn’t hardly hear any evidence of

anything that you alleged in the motion. About the only

thing I did hear was the waiter from the restaurant

could identify the child, the child’s father at the

restaurant on that particular day. But he could not say

whether or not these other lawyers and a judge were

there. And I don’t have any evidence, whatsoever, that

they were there. And those are really, really strong

allegations for you to make without being able to back

them up.

I’m not going to grant your motion.

And I’m very tempted to go ahead and change the custody over

on a temporary basis. However, I’m going to keep the

status quo right now.”

Following the above hearing, after a series of legal efforts, Mr. Sibley managed to get Titus to be allowed to testify before Judge Alcala.   This public record, unsealed video, is included in the DVD under the title “Titus_Interview_with_Judge_Alcala_Present”.

 The testimony of the mother on the child’s utterances have sent many a man to prison for life, but if the alleged abuser is a judge, then the mother is fined and her child taken, where there is more than enough evidence to convict or to at least start a more serious criminal investigation by law enforcement.

 I have testified in the Titus Mata case as to pattern and practice and in impeachment of one of the witness/attorneys in this affair.   I can provide impeachment documentation and transcripts on all parties, including Judge Galvan.

I wish to file this as a grievance and as a witness statement.  I state that the information contained herein is as true and accurate as I am able to determine.

Thank you for allowing me to participate in this very important and very serious deliberation.

 Sincerely,

 Stanley A. Rains, Jr.

9 Comments
by thepatriotdad on April 14, 2012  •  Permalink
Posted in Child Abuse, Corrupt Courts, debtors prison, Feminism, Gender Bias, Gender Biased Courts, Judge William Adams, Judicial Corruption, Parental Alienation, Texas Bar Corruption, Texas Corruption, Texas Judicial Review Corrupt, Texas Judiciary, Texas Rangers, Uncategorized
Tagged , , , ,

Posted by thepatriotdad on April 14, 2012

https://thepatriotdad.wordpress.com/2012/04/14/grievance-against-galvan-alcala-adams/

Where All the Good Men Are, And Kay Hymowitz Has No Clue.


A critique of “Where Have All the Good Men Gone” by Kay M. Hymowitz:

Dear MS. Kay M. Hymowitz,

In response to the Wall Street Journal article of  February 2011, The Good Men are avoiding you like the plague and the only men willing to court the feminist black widows are the men willing to risk being served up as a  life ending midnight knosh.  Ironically, the vast majority of women who destroy the fathers of their children end up as prey to the legal system and to their own offspring who suck the life from their own mother through the children’s life long bitterness, addictions, prostitution, violence, and worse.   One only has to research the prognosis of single mother children for addictions, prostitution, imprisonment, etc… What man wants to have children he will not be able to raise or see while they are growing up? What man wants to have children who are ten times more likely to prostitutes, drug addicts or sex offenders? And you wonder why men are walking away?

This tragedy of single mother raised children happens at all economic levels.   The very wealthy gold-digger’s children have the same tragic prognosis as the ghetto welfare mother’s children.  The futures of the children of  both are statistically very very bleak with the least of problems being serial relationships and marriages.

Kay Hymowitz is getting close for a feminist, but she still doesn’t get it.   She keeps laying the blame on the men even when she admits her sister feminists are beating up the men.    MS. Hymowitz seems to think her power mad sister feminists are equals to men in so many arenas.   She should research more carefully the entitlements of job preferences, education preferences, famliy law preferences, etc…, at the expense of taxpayer’s and individual men’s wallets is an acceptable proposition.    She can’t even get the foundation of her argument quite right. Women are not equal, they are propped up by massive infusions of governmental cash and quotas that must be met or subject employers, schools, professions to civil and criminal persecutions. And, after the fun wears off the elitist women who have destroyed so many resources for their empty image of professionalism just pack up and go home. Over half of them are back at home in under 12 years. What is the cost to industry, tax payors, and the men’s incomes that these entitled women wasted, spent and destroyed.  

In reference to Kay’s rather shallow and superficial approach to her work titled “Where Have All The Good Men Gone?”  and “Manning Up.” Has she stopped to look, critically, within when it comes to the men in her life?  

If I were to have a discussion with Kay on this topic, my points would go something like this:

You believe manning up is paying for some slick tramps bills for the rest of her life while he is lucky to get spam on Fridays, instead of his daily Ramen Noodles.   Is the feminist vagina so golden and his penis so dirty as to justify a man’s life-time enslavement to a once upon a time lover or ex-wife?   Why don’t you start telling your sisters to ‘WOMAN UP’ and be responsible for their own lives and bad decisions.

 How can you, as a feminist, hope for  anything but an emotionally armed truce for mutual transient needs when you are so hyper-critical of men and continuing to demand the many things that women want from men?  

If the courts and legislature mandated a woman provide for a man’s needs for life once she divorces or once she sleeps with him, how crazy would that sound to the feminists of Kay S. Hymowitz circles?   How loud would you and your puerile femi-sisters scream?   Yet they demand the courts and government provide that very enslavement of men to the entitled feminist.    Kay S. you are intellectually dishonest.

Misandry, as with misogyny is a form of self-loathing.   And, you reek of self-loathing in your attacks on the wisdom of men avoiding predatory, ungrateful, and faithless women.  You make men even more cautious around the large numbers of decent women who are still out there.    But, yet, we are boys for not charging, lemming like, over the cliffs of matrimony in to the unforgiving cold sea below or to be like male paramours of black widow spiders who become the after sex snack of a cold and uncaring mate who will herself be fed upon by her brood.   You, Kay Hymowitz, are emotionally dishonest.

You envy what the decent women have, a caring supportive and financially supporting man who loves the woman and the children he gives her.   But you want it without the entanglement of actually getting to know or respect a man.  You espouse wanting to take the man’s children, money, home, respect, family, and anything else you can steal and pry from his still live fingers and then wonder why men avoid you and your feminist sisters with whom you surround yourself?   You are dishonest and misleading to the vast majority of your own gender.

You surround yourself with man-haters, you write man-hate articles and books, and then you want men to worship you and decent men to flock to you for you to pick and chose amongst them for the one who you think will complete you the most?

Are you crazy?  

That was not rhetorical.   Anyone who has taken their college freshman liberal blinders off will tell you that you don’t attack victims by warning them of your scam ahead of time.   You don’t put up traffic signs to  inform “This Way to be Hijacked” , or “Roadside Piracy 2 Miles Ahead”.    I’m sorry, but you just did put up your roadsigns, didn’t you?

And you say these men are not ‘Manning Up’ because they do not take the Hijack or Piracy exits?  

You are crazy to think you deserve the fruits of someone else’s labor without quid pro quo.   You are crazy to think the smart and capable will buy into your plan to destroy them, their offspring (look at the prognosis for children raised by your single feminist sisters) and possibly end their life (15,000 men a year commit suicide from loss of family, children, home, etc.  in our family courts) just to fund your Narcissistic self-destructive life-styles.     And, men have become mere boys for not ‘Manning Up’ eagerly for your sadistic and torturous treatments.

How much arrogance can feminism contain?    Are all believing they are each and everyone a Helen of Troy when in statement and deed they are Medeas?

How can you ever be sure the very personal rejection your feminist compatriots sexual charms isn’t just a self-defense reaction from the men you attack?  Could it be that your physical sexual attributes that women like to over-value, do not overcome your advertising yourself as a female equivalent of a preying mantis ready to prey upon and feed upon the very father of her children?  

How can you not understand the basics of ‘Risk to Reward’ decision making process of men?  There are even mathmatical algorithms to minutely quantify this decision making process.   Yet you ignore the factor of self preservation.   

Why should any man, who is much more emotionally, financially, and psychologically self-contained, risk total and absolute destruction of himself and any children he gives a feminist when he can have a full and fun life without the heartaches and impoverishment feminism brings men, women, and children?  

You  have written and been published  in the context of racial social policy what single motherhood portends for the children and the duped single mothers in the Black ghetto.  Your racism shows through when you can not apply the same near objectivity  to your white middle-class feminist sisters.

It is not the men who have embraced a culturally new ideology of gender warfare, government whoredom of women with welfare, and enforced system entitlements, but the women who have built a world view based on feminist myth of all men as violent rapists and a demand for a total lack of personal accountability for the feminists’ own life decisions, violence, sex offenses against men and children, etc…. 

As the ideology of feminism is being rejected more and more by the larger number of women in this country, we see the die-hard feminists begin to moderate their statements of misandry and begin to speak of women as equals to men all things male, but maintain strict boundaries on all things female.

Feminism is the ultimate female movement for dependence and entitlement. It is a movement of slavers.

Feminist policy goals are to make someone else, a man, the government, society, anybody, responsible for their discontent and desired lifestyle level.

To be dependent for life is foremost and premier as the underlying dogma of all feminist effort.  This is true, whether a man is supposed to ‘man up’ and provide a woman her every need at her every whim or a government to pay a woman’s way while she looses count of the men’s shoes under her bed as she ‘sucks’ them in and then discards them like yesterday’s banana peel.  This demanded dependency is such that no woman is to be held accountable, only some man, even if he is a stranger, is supposed to “Man up”.

Sexual Promiscuity is a process that the feminist recruit has been told will ‘sexually liberate’ her,  especially if she experiments with homosexuality.   Yet these perverse, risky, and self-destructiveactions leave her with a feeling of degradation and self-loathing she transfers in a defensive reflex into blaming men.  Feminist avoid responsibility by blaming men for the feminists’ own bad decisions.   Accountability only counts for men.   

Feminists are so angry at men because when the feminist demands for ultimate and totally unaccountable female relationship and financial power became too heavy a trade-off, the men walked.  Slaves aren’t supposed to be able to walk, so they must be punished and demeaned. Women have been peripheral in men’s lives.

Kay Hymowitz is first and foremost among the more popular pseudo-intellectual who has made a career of demeaning men, accusing men of avoiding women after watching their fathers and grandfathers stripped of home, children, family, and wealth by some faithless woman.

Men have never needed a woman ‘to complete’ them, or we would not have adventurers, sailors, or early world trade caravans.  We would still be sitting in the savannah waiting for some predator to come and eat our slower members, the very young, elderly, or pregnant women. As women demand evermore enslavement of men, politically, culturally, socially, legally, emotionally and financially, men, as men in the ghettos have done, walk.

What sane man will build permanent ties with a woman who espouses man-hate, man-abuse, and man-enslavement. Hello? Any one home over there at the feminist encampment?  

When feminists become mothers and do not appreciate the gifts men bring, every thing the man does will cause the feminist to be angry no matter how supportive or enriching the man’s acts are towards the feminist..   As with any Narcissistic woman, she will be angry if the children get too much attention, the birthday gift was less than $10,000, not buy her the newest SUV or if he asks her to cut back on her twice a week day spa. The woman retaliates with divorce that forces wage slavery and punitive measures on a man who gave his all for giving his all. This will show him, it will destroy his career, create a tragic prognosis for the children’s adulthoods, and impoverish all. But, by God she showed him how mighty she is. Now, in a divorce, the courts will state that he must provide for the family and his ex as if he were still receiving all of the benefits of his marriage plus pay her attorneys who stole from the family as a whole, plus carry another home, plus pay for ‘visits’ with his own children, plus, plus, plus….. Just this one factor will drive many of the more intelligent and capable single young men away from marriage, commitment, and family.

Yet, we have so many more factors than those listed above to describe where Feminism, not women as a whole, has incentivized men to forego what they would like but do not have to have, a wife and children. Feminist have worked at detracting from the gifts a man brings to a relationship, not as another woman, but as an emotional counter weight to the realities of women’s hormonally driven emotions and to the economic support so that women can have the privilege of the financial, emotional, sexual and cultural security a man brings to a relationship. It is when a woman honors a man for what he provides of himself to her and any children that he gives of himself, completely. I do not hear Kay begin to honor men for what they bring to the table, she can only demean it.

Why should any man honor a woman with a lifelong commitment of support when she demeans him and his gender as well as the many gifts he brings. Feminists are such spoiled little children who have long ago lost all appreciation of others.

Ms Hymowitz, your self-professed feminism  is an ideology of Narcissism.  Feminists will breed themselves into non-existence (or it would be better stated they will not be bred into the future.) Feminism is an already dying ideology of personal tyranny.  How ironic and shallow that feminists call the men who rightfully avoid these feminists, Narcissists. 

You should look past the blind inconsistencies of feminism and then you will find what you really want, a partner and a friend who you can trust respect and to whom you are trustworthy and respectful.  You will be able to answer your former feminist sisters, “All The Good Men Are Hiding From You.”

4 Comments
by thepatriotdad on December 26, 2011  •  Permalink
Posted in Corrupt Courts, Divorce, family, Feminism, Gender Bias, Gender Biased Courts, Media Man-Hate, misandry, Poverty, Uncategorized

Posted by thepatriotdad on December 26, 2011

https://thepatriotdad.wordpress.com/2011/12/26/where-all-the-good-men-are-hiding-from-you/